Jump to main content.


Frequent Questions

Recycling Grows Green Logo

Below are some of the most commonly asked questions regarding the economic benefits of recycling. If you do not find the answer to your question below, you can submit a request using our questions form.

More Links and Resources

Economics and Recycling Links and Resources

Climate Change and Recycling Links and Resources

Community Development and Recycling Links and Resources

Jump to answers to frequents questions about recycling and Climate Change or Community Development using the links below.

Climate Change Frequent Questions

Community Development Frequent Questions

Economic Frequent Questions

What are some quick economic facts about recycling?

What costs my community more—recycling or throwing trash away?

If there is plenty of landfill space, why should I recycle?

How much is the Southeast throwing away?

Are there markets for recyclables in the Southeast, and if so, where can I find information about them?

What are the benefits of Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) Programs?

What are some states doing on a state-wide level to increase participation in recycling programs?

Are there grants available to help my community recycle more?


What are some quick economic facts about recycling?

Back to Question List

What costs my community more—recycling or throwing trash away?

The answer to this question will vary depending on where you live and comparing recycling program and waste disposal costs is a complex undertaking. Disposal fees for landfills, waste transfer stations, and incinerators vary across the country, but in many areas, particularly on the heavily populated East Coast, they are significant expenses. Costs and returns for recycling programs also vary greatly, depending on the local resources and demand for the recovered materials.

Recycling does cost money, but so does waste disposal. Communities must pay to collect trash and manage a landfill or incinerator and so they should expect to pay for recycling. Assessing how recycling will impact your community requires a full appraisal of the environmental and economic benefits and costs of recycling, as compared to the one-way consumption of resources from disposing of used products and packaging in landfills and incinerators. Analyzing all of these factors together will help you determine if recycling is more cost effective in your community.

The report, Anti-Recycling Myths: Commentary on Recycling is GarbageExit EPA Disclaimer, by John F. Ruston and Richard A. Denison, Ph.D. of the Environmental Defense Fund, provides one point of view on the costs and benefits of recycling and waste disposal. 

For ideas on how to improve existing recycling practices, an EPA resource entitled Getting More for Less: Improving Collection Efficiency [Adobe PDF, 880 KB, about PDF] (EPA530-R-99-038) explains several important strategies for improving efficiency as well as case studies of communities that have reaped the benefits of improved solid waste collection.

Back to Question List

If there is plenty of landfill space, why should I recycle?

Recycling offers a host of environmental, economic, and societal benefits. While landfill space is plentiful on the national level, some areas of the United States, particularly the heavily populated East Coast, have less landfill capacity and higher landfill costs.

Communities can make money and avoid high disposal costs by selling certain recyclable materials. Markets for recovered materials fluctuate, however—as markets do for all commodities—depending on a variety of economic conditions. For more information on the value of recovered materials, please visit the Global Recycling Network.Exit EPA Disclaimer.

A report released by the National Recycling Coalition (NRC) Exit EPA Disclaimer at the end of 2001, offers perhaps the most compelling evidence of how and why recycling makes good economic sense. Simply put, recycling creates jobs and generates valuable revenue for the U.S. According to the U.S. Recycling Economic Information Study, more than 56,000 recycling and reuse establishments in the U.S. employ approximately 1.1 million people, generate an annual payroll of $37 billion, and gross $236 billion in annual revenues. According to the report, the number of workers in the recycling industry is comparable to the automobile and truck manufacturing industry and is significantly larger than mining and waste management and disposal industries. In addition, wages for workers in the recycling industry are notably higher than the national average for all industries, according to the report. For additional information on the economic impact of recycling, visit EPA's Jobs Through Recycling Web site.

Back to Question List

How much is the Southeast throwing away?

According to the Curbside Value PartnershipExit EPA Disclaimer, an estimated $1.2 billion worth of recyclable materials were disposed of in Region 4 states based on the 2006 population. Paper, one of the easiest materials to recycle, had the highest percent of lost value for the region. In addition to the lost value of these recyclables, one must also consider the cost of tipping fees for dumping such valuable materials.

SP Newsprint out of Dublin, GA, is one of the largest recycling corporations in the Southeast. Specifically, their paper mill consumes more than 750,000 tons of recycled fiber each year in making 100% recycled newsprint. However, the Southeast domestic demand for old newsprint exceeds the available supply. If SP Newsprint recovered all the used newspapers and publishers' production scrap in the State of Georgia, they would still have to purchase quality tonnage from other Southeast market areas and beyond to meet their production needs.

According to South Carolina’s Economic Report compiled in 2005, the average price for a ton of PET plastic was $220. With an estimated state recycling rate of only 4.9% for plastic, the value of materials in landfills was over $8.5 million. By 2009, Coca-Cola plans to open the largest plastic bottle recycling plant in Spartanburg, South Carolina. While the demand for recycled plastics is high in the Southeast, the market is only getting stronger.

Table: Curbside Value Partnership Southeast Estimated Unrecyclables Value Lost
EPA Region 4 States: 2006 Population % of U.S. Population Share of Lost Value ($) Estimated Lost lbs. Estimated Lost Tons

Alabama

        4,599,030

1.5%

            97,364,982

           2,820,835,839

      1,410,418

Mississippi

        2,910,540

1.0%

            61,618,357

           1,785,192,865

         892,596

Louisiana

        4,287,768

1.4%

            90,775,327

           2,629,921,884

      1,314,961

Florida

      18,089,888

6.0%

          382,976,761

         11,095,514,573

      5,547,757

Georgia

        9,363,941

3.1%

          198,241,791

           5,743,415,539

      2,871,708

Tennessee

        6,038,803

2.0%

          127,846,077

           3,703,927,116

      1,851,964

North Carolina

        8,856,505

3.0%

          187,498,983

           5,432,177,374

      2,716,089

South Carolina

        4,321,249

1.4%

            91,484,145

           2,650,457,607

      1,325,229

Totals:

 

19.5%

       1,237,806,423

         35,861,442,797

    17,930,721

 

Back to Question List

Are there markets for recyclables in the Southeast and if so, where can I find information about them?

The Southeast has markets for all types of recyclables.

By collecting more recyclable commodities from homes and businesses, the Southeast can help set the stage for the future expansion of current manufacturing operations. That expansion will result in more jobs, stronger tax revenue, and an overall brighter economic picture for the region.

EPA has compiled a fairly comprehensive list of state-specific waste exchanges. The site provides information on markets for buying and selling reusable and recyclable commodities. In addition to EPA’s resources, Resource Recycling Magazine and other trade journals regularly post current recycling markets. The non-profit Southern Waste Information eXchang (SWIX)Exit EPA Disclaimer is a helpful tool as well. You can also contact your state’s recycling representative for more in-depth information and assistance with your community programs.

For information about specific markets, check out these organizations:

Back to Question List

What are the benefits of Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) Programs?

In communities with Pay-As-You-Throw programs (also known as unit pricing or variable-rate pricing), residents are charged for the collection of municipal solid waste—ordinary household trash—based on the amount they throw away. This creates a direct economic incentive to recycle more and to generate less waste.

Traditionally, residents pay for waste collection through property taxes or a fixed fee, regardless of how much—or how little—trash they generate. PAYT breaks with tradition by treating trash services just like electricity, gas, and other utilities. Households pay a variable rate depending on the amount of service they use.

According to the EPA PAYT program, the economic advantages of switching to PAYT can be great. Well-designed programs generate the revenues communities need to cover their solid waste costs, including the costs of such complementary programs as recycling and composting. Residents benefit, too, because they have the opportunity to take control of their trash bills. For advice from other community implementers of PAYT programs, check out this EPA site for answers to frequently asked questions.

According to the EPA and Skumatz Economic Research Associates (SERA) report Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) in the U.S.: 2006 Update and AnalysisExit EPA Disclaimer, PAYT programs in the U.S. have grown from about 100 in the late 1980s to over 7,000 in 2007, representing about 25% of U.S. communities. Collectively, these program are annually keeping 4.6—8.3 million of tons of MSW out of the landfill, and saving 61—109 million MBTU.

Downtown Athens, GA & Pay-As-You-Throw

Creative Solutions for Efficient Recycling

Problem: Downtown Athens has too little space for trash and recycling receptacles and few alleyways. As a large college town, the late night bar and restaurant scene requires night-time collection to keep the streets clean. Much of the trash collected consists of recyclable materials, such as beverage bottles and cans.

Solution: The Athens-Clarke County Solid Waste DepartmentExit EPA Disclaimer decided to implement a PAYT program which requires customers to purchase clear county-issued bags for their trash and to pay for trash collection based on the frequency of collection needed. Due to the space limitations downtown, the commercial business sector turned to an all-bag collection program. The cost for the county-required, clear “trash” bags is currently $1 per bag, while recycling bags are free of charge. This setup makes recycling a more attractive and affordable option for downtown businesses when compared to disposing of waste. The use of clear bags also makes it easy to pinpoint which businesses could benefit from outreach about the benefits of recycling.

In addition to the PAYT program, a night shift supervisor was hired in the county’s fiscal year 2007, to communicate with bars and restaurants in the PAYT program and to run the program more efficiently. Since the introduction of a night shift supervisor, the percentage of tons recycled by the downtown businesses has improved 96%.

For more about ACC's PAYT program, check out this Recycling Today ArticleExit EPA Disclaimer from 2004.

Back to Question List

What are some states doing on a state-wide level to increase participation in recycling programs?

One of the most effective ways to increase participation in recycling is through passing laws and putting regulatory measures in place to ensure efficient and comprehensive recycling programs. Encouraging legislators to approve funding for solid waste reduction programs is essential. For example, thanks to Florida legislators’ allocation of money in 1997, $1.2 Million was set aside to fund counties’ innovative solutions to Municipal Solid Waste and other Solid Waste. The funds supported projects, such as a Landfill Methane Reuse project, a Commercial and Institutional Electronics Recycling Program, and the Greening of Commercial and Institutional Venues and Events Program.

After the initiation of the South Carolina Solid Waste Policy and Management Act of 1991, the SC Department of Health and Environmental Control implemented a $2 advanced recycling fee which is added onto the cost of tires. This small amount of money has gone a long way and led to the recycling or disposal of 7 million tires from illegal stockpiles, the creation of the Asphalt Rubber Technology Service at Clemson University, grants for local governments to build tire drop off facilities that are convenient for its residents, and much more. This simple piece of legislation allowed the DHEC to implement the tire program, which is now recognized by the Rubber Manufacturers Association as one of the top scrap tire recycling programs in the country.

Programs such as North Carolina’s social marketing concept RE3.orgExit EPA Disclaimer and South Carolina’s Recycle Guys,Exit EPA Disclaimerare also extremely effective resources for engaging the community and raising awareness about the importance of recycling and its accessibility.

Using social marketing techniques, the NC Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance designed RE3 to increase participation in recycling through positive behavior change.  Recycling coordinators across the state use RE3 materials in their programs, presentations and interactions with the public to reinforce the RE3 concepts of recycling, reducing and reusing. Coupled with a statewide media campaign, including television and cinema ads, RE3 reaches from the mountains to the coast encouraging people to recycle – and not just at home. This campaign develops recycling behaviors at the office, at parties, at ballgames and anywhere else North Carolinians go.

Municipalities have also been reaching out to organizations such as the Curbside Value Partnership (CVP)Exit EPA Disclaimer with help in reaching their recycling goals. The CVP was created with two simple goals: to increase participation in residential curbside recycling programs and to measure growth to enable better decision making. The focus of CVP is social marketing. Resources for creating public service announcements and developing and measuring community recycling campaigns are available, as well as an educational toolkit. For a glimpse at successful community recycling campaigns already developed in partnership with CVP, click hereExit EPA Disclaimer.

Back to Question List

Are there grants available to help my community recycle more?

Local and state governments have a large to-do list when it comes to running a recycling program. A key link you will want to bookmark on your computer is Grants.Gov,Exit EPA Disclaimer a Web site that helps local and state governments and non-profit organizations find federal grant funding to help expand waste reduction services.  All federal agencies are required to post grant notifications to this site. Your state office may also have grant funding available.

The Catalog of Federal Domestic AssistanceExit EPA Disclaimer provides detailed information regarding EPA grant programs, including eligibility requirements, types of projects to be funded, available grant amounts, etc. If you meet the criteria for an EPA assistance program and wish to apply for a grant, you must fill out an application and forward it to the appropriate EPA office. Your application will be evaluated, and if it meets EPA standards, a grant may be awarded to your organization to fund the project. For Region 4 contacts on grants, click here.

In case grant writing is not your strong suit, EPA offers tips on writing a grant proposal, as well as an interactive softwareExit EPA Disclaimer tool that walks users through the grant-writing process and helps them learn to write more competitive grants.

Back to Question List

 

Climate Change Frequent Questions

How does recycling reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) and contribute to protecting the earth from climate change?

Does the transportation and reprocessing of recyclables outweigh the energy savings?

Is every-other-week curbside collection of recyclables worth the energy savings in gas?

How do I research and contact buyers for my community's recycled goods?

How does composting play a role in reducing GHGs?

Are there any tools available to help communities develop a baseline assessment of their waste practices and capture opportunities to improve them?

Are there any programs available to guide community leaders with their community waste reduction goals?

What can be done in my community to avoid landfilling electronic waste?


How does recycling reduce GHGs and contribute to protecting the earth from climate change? 

As waste materials undergo anaerobic decomposition in landfills, methane gas is produced and released into the atmosphere; when waste materials are incinerated, carbon dioxide (CO2) is released into the atmosphere. The addition of these gases to the earth’s atmosphere can have a warming effect on the earth. GHGs occur naturally and help trap heat in the upper atmosphere, creating climates that sustain life on our planet. However, increased concentrations of these gases can contribute to rising global temperatures, sea level changes, and other climate changes. Recycling prevents methane gas and CO2 emissions from landfills and incinerators by reducing gas-releasing waste in our landfills and incinerators. To understand more about the link between material solid waste and GHGs, visit EPA's general information Web site on Climate Change or check out the the U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reports.

Back to Question List

Does the transportation and reprocessing of recyclables outweigh the energy savings?

Whether hauling waste to the landfill or to a recycling facility, transportation is required.  While landfilling takes waste to its grave, recycling allows materials to have a new life cycle. Harvesting, extracting, and processing the raw materials used to manufacture new products is an energy-intensive activity. Reducing or nearly eliminating the need for these processes, therefore, achieves huge savings in energy. Recycling aluminum cans, for example, saves 95 percent of the energy required to make the same amount of aluminum from its virgin source, bauxite. The amount of energy saved differs by material, but almost all recycling processes achieve significant energy savings compared to production using virgin materials. Visit the EPA site for more information on Transportation and Recycling.

Back to Question List

Is every-other-week curbside collection of recyclables worth the energy savings in gas?

Although you may think that every other week collection of recycling saves energy by reducing fossil fuel combustion from trucks by 50%, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) found that the consequences of this collection method actually outweighs the benefits. Less frequent collection leads to 9-20% fewer participants, fewer recyclables, and greater time for contamination of recycled materials. Check out Oregon's DEQ GHG report for more information.

Back to Question List

How do I research and contact buyers for my community’s recycled goods?

EPA has a fairly comprehensive listing of material waste exchanges. Information on what commodities are available or needed, as well as contacts, can be found at EPA's Jobs Through Recycling Web site.

Back to Question List

How does composting play a role in reducing GHGs?

Composting is the controlled biological decomposition of organic matter, such as food and yard wastes, into humus, a soil-like material. Composting is nature's way of recycling organic waste into new soil, which can be used in vegetable and flower gardens, landscaping, and many other applications. In 2006, data on U.S. Municipal Solid Waste generation indicate that of the 251 million tons of solid waste generated, 12.9% is yard waste and 12.4% is food residuals. A large portion of food waste is generated from food processing, pre- and post-consumer utilization, and institutional locations (i.e., hospitals, universities, etc.). When yard waste and food residuals are composted rather than landfilled the amount of GHG emissions are reduced since composting is a biological process of decomposition which produces CO2 both during the composting process and after the compost is added to the soil. Because this CO2 is naturally-occurring and returns to the atmosphere through photosynthesis, it is not counted as a GHG in the Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks.   For more on composting, visit EPA's Composting Web site.

Back to Question List

Are there any tools available to help communities develop a baseline assessment of their waste practices and capture opportunities to improve them?

EPA has created several tools to aid community leaders in assessing their waste management practices and evaluating alternative management of waste. The Waste Reduction Model (WARM) is a free, user-friendly software tool that enables waste managers to compare GHG emissions from business-as-usual waste management practices with emissions from alternative strategies. The ReCon Tool calculates GHG emissions and energy consumption related to purchasing and/or manufacturing activities using analyses of baseline and alternative recycled-content scenarios, while the The Durable Goods Calculator estimates GHG emissions and energy in order to support voluntary gas measurement and reporting initiatives, as well as provide information regarding the GHG emission implications of waste management decisions. For a link to more tools,visit EPA's Climate Change Waste Tools Website.

Back to Question List

Are there any programs available to guide community leaders with their community waste reduction goals?

EPA has several voluntary environmental programs. WasteWise is a voluntary partnership between EPA and U.S. businesses, Federal, tribal, state and local governments, and institutions to prevent waste, recycle, and buy and manufacture products made with recycled materials. Presently, more than 1,200 organizations are participating in the WasteWise program.  In order to aid municipalities with Pay-As-You-Throw Programs, EPA provides technical and outreach assistance to encourage communities to implement PAYT systems for managing solid waste.  Under PAYT, residents are charged based on the amount of trash they discard.  This creates an incentive for them to generate less trash and recycle more. Currently, there are over 5,000 PAYT communities in the U.S.  On average, communities with PAYT see waste reductions of 14 to 27%.  For more information on the link between material solid waste and GHGs, visit the EPA Climate Change Website, and for more programs visit the EPA Voluntary Programs Website.

Back to Question List

What can be done in my community to avoid landfilling electronic waste (e-waste)?

Starting with environmentally preferable products to begin with is the best way to combat the hazards associated with the disposal of e-waste. Look to purchase electronics that meet performance criteria showing they are environmentally preferable.

The Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT)Exit EPA Disclaimer is a procurement tool to help institutional purchasers in the public and private sectors evaluate, compare and select desktop computers, notebooks, and monitors based on their environmental attributes. EPEAT also provides a clear and consistent set of performance criteria for the design of products, and provides an opportunity for manufacturers to secure market recognition for efforts to reduce the environmental impact of its products.

But, what about those products that are already past their prime? EPA has designed an e-waste prevention program called Plug-in to eCycling. The Plug-In To eCycling Campaign is one of many new efforts under EPA's Resource Conservation Challenge (RCC) which seeks to increase the national recycling rate to 35%, among other goals. The campaign aims to get the word out about opportunities to reuse and recycle your old computers, TVs, and cell phones, and to build momentum for even more reuse and recycling programs. Under the RCC, EPA is working with electronics manufacturers, retailers, and government agencies to reduce the environmental impacts of electronic products during their production, use, and disposal. The Agency will also establish partnerships and alliances with industry, states, and environmental groups; provide training, tools, and technology assistance for businesses, governments, and citizen groups; and get the word out through outreach and assistance to the general population, especially to youth and minority groups.

Back to Question List

Community Development Frequent Questions

How does recycling impact the community?

Myth: There are no markets for recyclables in the Southeast.

Myth: There is plenty of space for landfills, making recycling unimportant.

Myth: When bottles are recycled, they just make more bottles.

Myth: Recycling is hard.

Myth: Recycling is not worth the effort.


How does recycling impact the community?

Back to Question List

Myth: There are no markets for recyclables in the Southeast.

The Southeast has markets for all types of recyclables.

By collecting more recyclable commodities from homes and businesses, the Southeast can help set the stage for the future expansion of current manufacturing operations. That expansion will result in more jobs, stronger tax revenue, and an overall brighter economic picture for the region.

EPA has compiled a fairly comprehensive list of state-specific waste exchanges. The site provides information on markets for buying and selling reusable and recyclable commodities. In addition to EPA’s resources, Resource Recycling Magazine and other trade journals regularly post current recycling markets. The non-profit Southern Waste Information eXchang (SWIX)Exit EPA Disclaimer is a helpful tool as well. You can also contact your state’s recycling representative for more in-depth information and assistance with your community programs. EPA has information about the economics of recycling as well.

For information about specific markets, check out these organizations:

Back to Question List

Myth: There is plenty of space for landfills, making recycling unimportant.

Recycling offers a host of environmental, economic, and societal benefits. While landfill space is plentiful on the national level, some areas of the U.S., particularly the heavily populated East Coast, have less landfill capacity and higher landfill costs. Communities can make money and avoid high disposal costs by selling certain recyclable materials. Markets for recovered materials fluctuate; however, as markets do for all commodities, depending on a variety of economic conditions.

A report released by the National Recycling CoalitionExit EPA Disclaimer at the end of 2001 offers perhaps the most compelling evidence of how and why recycling makes good economic sense. Simply put, recycling creates jobs and generates valuable revenue for the U.S.. According to the U.S. Recycling Economic Information Study, more than 56,000 recycling and reuse establishments in the United States employ approximately 1.1 million people, generate an annual payroll of $37 billion, and gross $236 billion in annual revenues. According to the report, the number of workers in the recycling industry is comparable to the automobile and truck manufacturing industry and is significantly larger than mining and waste management and disposal industries. In addition, wages for workers in the recycling industry are notably higher than the national average for all industries, according to the report. For additional information on the economic impact of recycling, visit EPA's Jobs Through Recycling Web site.

Back to Question List

Myth: When bottles are recycled, they just make more bottles.

When plastic bottles are reprocessed to be recycled, the materials can be used as building blocks for a wide array of products. The same goes for most recyclables. Construction timbers can be made from recycled plastic. Other items made from recycled plastic are goggles, dog bowls, fleece jackets, carpets, and more. According to the American Beverage Association, glass bottles can be used in road pavement, marbles, beads, sand traps, fiberglass, and tiles. While aluminum from recycled cans is used in the production of fans, pans, washing machine parts, bicycles, furniture, and more. For more information on recycling commodities, check out EPA's municipal commodities Web site.

Back to Question List

Myth: Recycling is hard.

As long as the community is able to provide adequate recycling opportunities and accessibility, recycling should not be difficult for the consumer. The America’s Beverage Association’s Recycle It Now program believes that recycling success can be as simple as just reminding people to do it. As part of their campaign, they provide large plastic recycling containers in the form of a plastic soda bottle to not only encourage recycling, but to also make it easily accessible. Do not forget to provide visuals in the community so that every resident will know what can be recycled. For recycling outreach ideas including artwork, advertisements, and state contacts, go to the Region 4 Recycling site.

Back to Question List

Myth: Recycling is not worth the effort.

Recycling is one of the best environmental success stories of the late 20th century. Recycling, which includes composting, diverted over 72 million tons of material away from landfills and incinerators in 2003, up from 34 million tons in 1990—doubling in just 10 years. Recycling turns materials that would otherwise become waste into valuable resources. As a matter of fact, collecting recyclable materials is just the first step in a series of actions that generate a host of financial, environmental, and societal returns. Below are several key benefits to recycling:

Learn about the benefits of recycling at EPA's Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Web site.

Recycling not only makes sense from an environmental standpoint, but also makes good financial sense. For example, creating aluminum cans from recycled aluminum is far less energy-intensive, and less costly, than mining the raw materials and manufacturing new cans from scratch. RE3.orgExit EPA Disclaimer states that aluminum recycling creates an energy savings of 95% compared to production from raw materials. This makes sense considering mining for bauxite is required to produce aluminum from scratch.

Because recycling is clearly good for human health, the nation's economy, and the environment, many people wonder why the federal government does not simply mandate recycling. The primary reason is that recycling is a local issue—the success and viability of recycling depends on a community's resources and structure. A community must consider the costs of a recycling program, as well as the availability of markets for its recovered materials. In some areas, not enough resources exist to make recycling an economically feasible option. State governments can assess local conditions and set appropriate recycling mandates. For information about recycling in your state, contact your EPA regional office, or your state agency.

 

In case grant writing is not your strong suit, EPA offers tips on writing a grant proposal, as well as an interactive software tool that walks users through the grant-writing process and helps them learn to write more competitive grants.

Back to Question List

 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.