General Information on Analysis and Reporting
This section provides general descriptive information including:
1) Overview of the Analysis Process
2) Statistical Estimation, Testing, and Computing Overview
3) Reporting the results from probability surveys
The Design Team recognizes that a primary reporting objective is to meet the requirements of section 305(b) of the CWA. Currently this includes both an Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Report and electronic submission of the data to EPA's Assessment Data Base. An summary of State's implementation and reporting status is included.
-
Delaware Streams
- Traditional 305(b) Assessment
- Probability Based Chemical Assessment
- Probability Based Biological Assessment
- Indiana Streams
-
Mid-Atlantic Highland Streams
- Biological Quality
- Ranking of Stressors
- Oregon
- Status - Stream Miles with Vertebrate Species
- Impairment Status - Macroinvertebrate Condition - % Stream Miles
- Impairment Status - Chemical vs Biological Indicators
- Six Habitat Parameters had Greatest Correlation with Biological Condition
- Percent Coarse Substrate
- Percent Fine Sediments (decreased response)
- Riparian Canopy Cover
- Shade
- Residual Pool Depth
- Fish Cover
4) Illustrative examples of Annual and Assessment Reporting
- EPA Region 4: Mercury in Fish From Wadeable Southeastern Streams
- Indiana 2001 Water Quality Report (PDF file) Mid-Atlantic Highlands Action Program: Transforming the Legacy
- Florida's Inshore Marine Monitoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)
5) Specific State Applications
Population Estimation Overview |
EMAP's approach to monitoring design relies on probability survey designs to select sites for monitoring. An integral part of using survey designs is having statistical analysis procedures linked with the design. The EMAP Statistical Methods Manual gives an overview of this approach. The introduction to the Manual is the basis for the information presented here. The individual estimation methods are available on the Technical Specifics page.