![[logo] US EPA](../gif/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
Please see www.epa.gov/nsr for the latest information on EPA's New Source Review program.
June 18, 1986 Exemption of Dimethyl Acetamide (DMAC) from Regulation under Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Review. 5.22
|
THE TEXT YOU ARE VIEWING IS A COMPUTER-GENERATED OR RETYPED VERSION OF A
PAPER PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL. ALTHOUGH CONSIDERABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN
EXPENDED TO QUALITY ASSURE THE CONVERSION, IT MAY CONTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL
ERRORS. TO OBTAIN A LEGAL COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, AS IT
CURRENTLY EXISTS, THE READER SHOULD CONTACT THE OFFICE THAT ORIGINATED
THE CORRESPONDENCE OR PROVIDED THE RESPONSE.
5.22
4APT-AP/lms JUN 18 1986
Mr. J. Preston Campbell, P.E. Dear Mr. Campbell: This is in response to your June 9 letter to Roger Pfaff concerning exemption of dimethyl acetamide (DMAC) from regulation under Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) review. EPA's policy on exclusion of organic compounds from regulations under PSD was forwarded to your agency in a July 31, 1981, letter from Thomas W. Devine. The letter can be found at Section 2.18 of the Region IV New Source Review PSD/Nonattainment Policy Reference Guide. The policy is that eleven organic compounds may be excluded. DMAC is not one of those compounds, and therefore can not be excluded from review. The North Carolina and California regulations referenced in your letter are not PSD regulations. Further, the North Carolina PSD regulation (15 NCAC .0530) contains a list of nine organic compounds not regulated under PSD, and DMAC is not one of those listed. I hope this letter fully responds to your requests. If you need further clarification, please contact Mr. Pfaff. Sincerely yours,
Bruce P. Miller |