Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
Please see www.epa.gov/nsr for the latest information on EPA's New Source Review program.
November 1, 1977 PSD Applicability Determination - ARCO Petroleum Refinery 4.1
THE TEXT YOU ARE VIEWING IS A COMPUTER-GENERATED OR RETYPED VERSION OF A
PAPER PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL. ALTHOUGH CONSIDERABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN
EXPENDED TO QUALITY ASSURE THE CONVERSION, IT MAY CONTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL
ERRORS. TO OBTAIN A LEGAL COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, AS IT
CURRENTLY EXISTS, THE READER SHOULD CONTACT THE OFFICE THAT ORIGINATED
THE CORRESPONDENCE OR PROVIDED THE RESPONSE.
4.1
SUBJECT: PSD Applicability Determination - ARCO Petroleum Refinery FROM: Director, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement TO: Lloyd A. Reed, Director Enforcement Division - Region X
This is in response to a telephone conversation between Dick Bauer of your staff and Rich Biondi of my staff concerning the applicability of the regulations for the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) to the ARCO refinery. This memo is intended to clarify a determination made by this Office on September 28, 1977, concerning this facility. This clarification has been necessitated by the recent events concerning the interpretation as to the effectiveness of Section 165 of the 1977 Clean Air Act, as amended. An October 6, 1977, memo from Messrs. Hawkins and Durning states EPA's position requiring the immediate application of Section 165. Since that time EPA has further considered this point and has determined that Section 165 will be effective only after proposal and promulgation of these changes in 40 CFR 51 and 52. A memorandum providing further guidance is attached. The effect of all this on the ARCO facility will be that the Cherry Point refinery will not be subject to PSD if ARCO can demonstrate that the operation of the coke calciner will not result in a net increase in emissions of sulfur dioxide and/or particulate matter from the entire refinery. That is, if ARCO can control other facilities within their refinery to such an extent so as to totally offset the emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide caused by the operation of the coke calciner, they will not be subject to the PSD requirements. This presumes that ARCO receives its permit before the revision to our PSD regulations which will expand the categories covered (approximately March 1, 1978) and they commence construction before the new PSD plan submissions are due from the States. If you have any additional questions or comments please contact Rich Biondi (755-2564) of my staff.
Attachment
cc: Mike Trutna - CPDD DATE: Sep 28, 1977 SUBJECT: PSD Applicability Determination - ARCO Petroleum Refinery
FROM: Director
TO: Gary L. O'Neal, Director
Mark Hooper, Chief
Lloyd A. Reed, Director This is in response to several memos from your office dated June 17, August 19, and August 24, 1977 concerning the proposed construction of a coke calciner at ARCO's petroleum refinery in Cherry Point, Washington. Rich Biondi of my staff has been in contact with Paul Boys and Dick Bauer of your staffs as well as members of Dick Rhoads' staff in the Control Programs Development Division in Durham, N.C. After considerable discussion between all interested parties, the relevant questions appear to be as follows: (1) Is the proposed coke calciner subject to the requirements of PSD? (2) Can ARCO delay installation of control equipment in compliance with the BACT requirements, until some time after commencement of operation? (3) Can the source avoid application of the PSD regulations by controlling the new facility and some existing facilities so as to negate any increased emissions? I will respond to these questions in the order presented in this memo.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Rich Biondi (755- 2564) of my staff.
cc: Dick Rhoads - CPDD
DATE: August 24, 1977 SUBJECT: Request for Applicability Determination - Under PSD Regulations
FROM: Lloyd A. Reed
TO: Edward E. Reich, Director Region X is currently reviewing an application from ARCO for a permit under PSD to install a coke calciner at its Ferndale, Washington refinery. Please provide this office with a determination whether the installation of a coke calciner at a petroleum refinery constitutes a modification subject to the currently effective PSD regulations. It does appear to Region X staff that the PSD regulations do not apply in this case. This determination is needed in this office by August 31, 1977. cc: D. E. Cooper Bob Courson Clark Gaulding
DATE: August 19, 1977 SUBJECT: ARCO Application for PSD Permit to Construct Petroleum Coke Calciner at its Cherry Point, Washington Refinery FROM: Mark H. Hooper, Chief Air Technical Compliance Section M/S 513
TO: Michael Trutna
Richard Biondi On August 11, 1977 ARCO submitted to EPA an application to construct a petroleum coke calciner at its Cherry Point, Washington refinery under the PSD regulations. The low sulfur petroleum coke product, which will be produced, will be used by the several aluminum plants in the Northwest to make carbon anodes for aluminum reduction. The sulfur content of this petroleum coke, which will then be available on a long-term basis, will be considerably less than that of the petroleum coke currently being used, resulting in a considerable environmental benefit because of the reduced SO2 emissions from the production of anodes. As I indicated to you in our telephone conversation today, ARCO has made a firm commitment to construct the process, operate the process, obtain the engineering design data for the scrubber and install the scrubber. Based on the current estimate of the exhaust gas properties, application of BACT will result in an emission concentration that will not exceed 1200 ppm SO2. This level of emission will not violate the increment. The acquisition of operating data to be used in specifying the design parameters of the scrubber is expected to result in an emission concentration that is considerably less than 1200 ppm. As a result it will be easier to allow further development due to reduced usage of the increment over BACT. Region X staff believe that allowing this phased approach will provide a net benefit to air quality through (1) a significant reduction in SO2 emissions from the affected aluminum refineries and (2) an emission rate from the coke calciner that is representative of control that is better than BACT. Because of the environmental benefits to be derived from the construction of the petroleum coke calciner and allowing a phased approach to the installation of the scrubber, Region X proposes to approve ARCO's application to construct under PSD provided concurrence can be obtained from CPDD and DSSE. The concurrence of your divisions is hereby requested. As you are aware, the review clock started on August 11. Your response is needed before August 31. If you have any questions concerning this request, please call Dick Bauer or me at 399-1387.
cc: R. R. Bauer
Date: June 17, 1977 SUBJECT: ARCO PSD Assistance
FROM: Gary L. O'Neal, Director
TO: Dick Rhoads, Director
CPDD Division This memo confirms a recent phone conversation on 6/13/77 between Paul Boys and Mike Trutna concerning the PSD review of the ARCO coke calciner. As a result of that conversation there are several questions that need to be addressed. I request that you or the appropriate person in OAQPS or DSSE provide us with guidance on each of the questions listed below.
Your early response to these issues, particularly the availability of contract assistance in the BACT process, will be appreciated. If you have questions, contact Paul Boys at (FTS) 399-1106.
cc: Ed Reich, DSSE |