Jump to main content.


Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

Please see www.epa.gov/nsr for the latest information on EPA's New Source Review program.

November 24, 1986 Need for a Short-term Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis for the Proposed William A. Zimmer Power Plant 10.29

THE TEXT YOU ARE VIEWING IS A COMPUTER-GENERATED OR RETYPED VERSION OF A PAPER PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL. ALTHOUGH CONSIDERABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN EXPENDED TO QUALITY ASSURE THE CONVERSION, IT MAY CONTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS. TO OBTAIN A LEGAL COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS, THE READER SHOULD CONTACT THE OFFICE THAT ORIGINATED THE CORRESPONDENCE OR PROVIDED THE RESPONSE.

10.29

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

MEMORANDUM:
----------
DATE: November 24, 1986

SUBJECT: Need for a Short-term Best Available Control Technology (BACT) Analysis for the Proposed William A. Zimmer Power Plant

FROM: Gerald A. Emison, Director
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (MD-10)

TO: David Kee, Director
Air Management Division, Region V (5AR-26)

This is in response to your November 17, 1986, memorandum, in which you requested comment on Region V's belief that prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permits must contain short-term emission limits to ensure protection of the applicable national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and PSD increments. I concur with your position and emphasize to you that this position reflects our current national policy. Consequently, I recommend that you continue to identify this apparent deficiency to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and seek correction of the draft permit for the William A. Zimmer Power Plant.

The PSD regulations clearly require that the application of BACT conform with any applicable standard of performance under 40 CFR Part 60 at a minimum. However, this should not be taken to supercede any additional limitations as needed to enable the source to demonstrate compliance with the NAAQS and PSD increments. In the case of sulfur dioxide (SO2), source compliance with the 30-day rolling average emission limit under subpart D(a) does not adequately demonstrate compliance with the short-term NAAQS and PSD increments. Consequently, enforceable limits pertaining to the performance of the flue gas desulfurization system on a short-term basis must also be established. Note, however, that the short-term limits can result from either BACT analyses or the need to protect air quality. Therefore, the short-term limit could be more stringent than the BACT limit.

2

I recognize that the sulfur variability issue tends to complicate the setting of short-term SO2 emission limits, but such limits must be defined nevertheless. Continuous emission monitoring data from comparable sources can be used in order to estimate worst-case short-term SO2 emissions that could occur at the plant. The modeling techniques used to determine compliance with the short-term NAAQS and increments should employ the enforceable short-term SO2 emission limits which the permitting agency establishes.

CPDD:SIB:NSRS:D.deroech:m.Whitt629-5591:rtp MD15:11/19/86
deRoeck 5-29-3

From
David Kee
Control No.
CPDD-427
Subject and Date

Request for Guidance on Short

Term BACT Analysis

Date Rec'd
11-18-86


Due Date
11-21-86
Referred(1)
McCutchen
(2)
DeRoeck
(3) (4)
Date
11-18-86

11-18-86
Reply Sent To

Date Released

Remarks

Easy response -- Agree with Region 5;
if disagree, see Darryl.

Prepare reply for Gerald A. Emison's
signature.

Acknowledged-Date


No Answer Needed

(Explain in Remarks)

MAIL CONTROL SCHEDULE
To: G.EMISON (EPA6200)

FROM: ARB/REG.V (EPA9553) (Posted) Mon 17-Nov-86 10:44 EST Sys 63 (39)

SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Short-Term BACT Analysis

Request for Guidance on Short-Term BACT Analysis

David Kee, Director
Air Management Division (5AR-26)

Gerald A. Emison, Director
Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Region V has recently completed an evaluation of Ohio EPA's draft permit for the William A. Zimmer Power Station Plant. Compliance with all pertinent Clean Air Act requirements, including Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements, was evaluated. During the course of these evaluations, a potentially significant problem arose in dealing with this fossil-fueled power plant employing flue gas desulfurization (FGD). Ohio's SO2 BACT analyses and emissions limits appear to have been based solely on a 30-day rolling average, an approach consistent with Subpart D(a) provisions for fossil fuel fired steam electric generating units. Region V is concerned that no emission limits based on 3-hr or 24-hr averaging periods have been included in Ohio's draft permit. The Region believes that short-term limits are necessary to ensure protection of the NAAQS and to adequately assess and protect increment consumption.

Accordingly, Region V has expressed its concerns to Ohio about the potential need for the SO2 BACT analysis to consider the performance of FGD systems on a short-term basis (i.e., 3-hr and/or 24-hr). Region V has also indicated that such short-term limits are necessary to protect the NAAQS and PSD increments. Region V would appreciate your guidance, concurrence or comments on the BACT analysis issue. Since Region V and Ohio will be discussing the need for a short-term BACT analysis and emission limits within ten (10) days, a prompt response is important. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Joseph Paisie of my staff at 886-5777.


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.