![[logo] US EPA](../gif/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
Please see www.epa.gov/nsr for the latest information on EPA's New Source Review program.
January 25, 1978 Applicability of the Emission Offset Policy 24.4
|
THE TEXT YOU ARE VIEWING IS A COMPUTER-GENERATED OR RETYPED VERSION OF A
PAPER PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL. ALTHOUGH CONSIDERABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN
EXPENDED TO QUALITY ASSURE THE CONVERSION, IT MAY CONTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL
ERRORS. TO OBTAIN A LEGAL COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT, AS IT
CURRENTLY EXISTS, THE READER SHOULD CONTACT THE OFFICE THAT ORIGINATED
THE CORRESPONDENCE OR PROVIDED THE RESPONSE.
24.4
MEMORANDUM FROM: Director Division of Stationary Source Enforcement TO: Jack Chicca, Chief Air Programs Branch - Region V This memo is in response to a telephone conversation between Mr. Thayio of your staff and Rich Biondi of DSSE. Mr. Thayio requested a determination as to whether major sources of methyl-chloroform are subject to the Interpretative Ruling (IR). After consulting with Kent Berry in the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) it was determined that 1) methyl-chloroform is not considered as a volatile organic compound, 2) it does not contribute to the formation of photochemical oxidants and, 3) it is therefore exempt from the requirements of the IR. If you have any additional questions or comments, please contact Rich Biondi (755-2564) of my staff.
cc: Kent Berry - OAQPS Mike Trutna - CPDD |