Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Water: Performance

National Water Program Performance Results Fiscal Year 2011

Each year, EPA's Office of Water conducts an assessment of the end of the year results for all performance measures of the National Water Program to determine progress in meeting the goals outlined in the Agency's Strategic Plan and National Water Program Guidance.

EOY Cover - 2011

FY 2011 Best Practices and End of the Year Performance Report (April 2012)

This Report includes final FY 2011 performance data for all National Water Program measures included in EPA's 2011-2015 Strategic Plan and the FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance. The report includes four key elements:

  • Overview of annual performance and long term trends for FY 2011 National Water Program measures.
  • Descriptions of innovative approaches and best practices of program implementation.
  • Individual chapters on performance for each Water Program subobjective under Goal 2 of the Strategic Plan, "Clean and Safe Water".
  • Appendices with detailed historical data on national and regional commitments and results for all Water Program performance measures.

FY 2011 Mid-Year Performance Report and Data (July 2011)

In May 2011, the National Water Program published the National Water Program Guidance describing how EPA, States, Tribes, and others would work together in FY 2011 to implement the water elements of the 2011-2015 Strategic Plan. This FY 2011 Mid-Year Performance Report describes the progress being made in 2011 towards the goals and objectives described in the Guidance and the EPA Strategic Plan.

Additional Reports


 
End of Year Performance Report

FY 2011 National Water Program
Best Practices and End of the Year Performance Report

Each year, EPA's Office of Water conducts an assessment of the end of the year results for all performance measures of the National Water Program to determine the progress in meeting the goals outlined in the Agency's Strategic Plan and National Water Program Guidance. This slideshow presents an overview of the results and trends for Fiscal Year 2011.

Numerous interactive charts and graphs are provided throughout the slideshow. To view details for funding, commitments, and results, move your cursor over the chart elements.

Press the "Esc" key at any time to stop the slideshow.

National Water Program Strategic Architecture

The FY 2011 National Water Program Best Practices and End of the Year Performance Report describes the progress made in 2011 by EPA, states, tribes, and others toward the objectives and subobjectives described in the FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance and the FY 2011–2015 EPA Strategic Plan.

EPA's FY 2011–2015 Strategic Plan is divided into five goals. The National Water Program is addressed in Goal 2, "Clean and Safe Water."

NWP Strategic Architecture Pyramid

National Water Program - Goals, Objectives, and Subobjectives

The FY 2011 National Program Guidance is divided into 2 objectives and 15 subobjectives and includes strategic target measures and national Program Activity Measures (PAMs) to assess progress toward the goals in the Strategic Plan.

NWP Objective Structure

FY 2011 Results & Trends Overview

  • In FY 2011, 64% of OW measures were met (down 6% from 2010), 22% were not met (down 2% from 2010), and 14% did not have data available (up 8% from 2010).
  • Trend data shows that OW has averaged about 66% measures met (range of 63% to 70%), 23% not met (range 22%-25%), 10% with data unavailable or not reporting (range 6%-15%).

FY 2011 Results & Trends Overview: Subjectives

  • The Wetlands, U.S.-Mexico Border, Coastal and Oceans, Gulf of Mexico, and Drinking Water subobjectives were most successful in meeting FY 2011 commitments.
  • The Pacific Island, South Florida, and Puget Sound subobjectives had the most difficulty in meeting their commitments in FY 2011.

FY 2011 Results & Trends Overview: Subobjectives

  • Oceans and Coastal Protection, Columbia River, Puget Sound, Wetlands, Drinking Water, and Great Lakes subobjectives have been the most successful in meeting their commitments over the past four years.
  • Wetlands and Mexico Border show greatest improvement over FY 2010.
  • Chesapeake Bay saw a significant decline in average measures met due to a drop in measures reporting in FY 2011.

FY 2011 Results & Trends Overview:
National vs. Geographic-Programs

  • The core programs were more successful than the geographic programs in meeting their commitments in 2011 (70% vs. 56%).
  • Though the geographic programs had more measures not met (28% vs. 17%), they also had a higher universe of measure data not reported (16% vs. 13%).
  • Geographic programs saw a significant decrease in measures met in 2011, reversing the trend from FY 2010.

FY 2010 Results & Trends Overview: EPA Regions

  • On average, all Regions performed well above the national level, meeting 83% of their commitments in FY 2011 (compared to 87% in FY 2010).
    • Region 1 had the highest (95%) and Region 7 (73%) had the lowest percent of measures met in FY 2011.
    • Nine Regions saw a drop in the percent commitments met in FY 2011 compared to FY 2010.

FY 2011 Results & Trends Overview: Tribes

  • The number of commitments met for Tribal-specific measures increased in FY 2011 (7).
  • The Agency fell short in meeting its commitments for the number tribes with water quality standards approved and the number of American Indian and Alaska Native homes provided access to safe drinking water.

Learn more »

FY 2011 Mid-Year vs. End of Year Results

  • Of the 54 commitment measures reported at mid-year, 91% (49) were on target. Two percent (1) were not on track.
  • Of the total 103 commitment measures reported at the end of the year, 64% (66) measures were met; and 22% (23) were not met.
    • Several measures that were on target at mid-year were not met at the end of the year.

Water safe to drinkWater Safe To Drink

*FY 2010 included ARRA funds to Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. Funding for the Drinking Water Protection Program includes: Drinking Water Protection, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, Public Water System Supervision, and Underground Injection Control.

EPA met 80% of its commitments for all drinking water measures in FY 2011. Twenty percent of commitments for drinking water measures were not met.
Learn more »

Water safe to drinkWater Safe To Drink

Ninety-three percent (93%) of the population was served by community water systems with drinking water that met all applicable health-based drinking water standards (commitment 91%).
Learn more »

EPA met its commitment for percent of "person months" (i.e., all persons served by community water systems times 12 months) during which CWS provide drinking water that meets all applicable health-based standards.
Learn more »

Water safe to drinkWater Safe To Drink

Ninety-two percent (92%) of community systems underwent a sanitary survey which was above the Agency's national commitment of 88% for the first time in five years.
Learn more »

Ninety percent (90%) of the cumulative amount of Drinking Water State Revolving Funds available had loan agreements in place (commitment of 87.7%). EPA has met its commitments for this measure for six years in a row.
Learn more »

Safe SwimmingSafe Swimming

EPA was successful in meeting two-thirds of its commitments under the Water Safe for Swimming subobjective in 2011. For coastal and Great Lakes beaches monitored by state-based beach safety programs, EPA found that 96% of days of the beach season were open and safe for swimming (FY11 commitment–951). EPA has consistently met this commitment over the past five years.
Learn more »

Water QualityWater Quality

*FY 2010 included ARRA funds to Clean Water State Revolving Fund. Funding for the Surface Water Protection Program includes: Surface Water Protection, Nonpoint Source, Pollution Control, and Clean Water State Revolving Fund.

EPA and states met 63% of their commitments under the Water Quality subobjective in FY 2011, fell short on 22% and data were not available for 22%. The percentage of commitments met rose in FY 2011 after dropping off in 2010.
Learn more »

Water QualityWater Quality

Over 3,100 of the waters listed as impaired in 2002 met water quality standards for all the identified impairments in FY 2011 (commitment–2,973). Out of a universe of 39,503 impaired waterbodies identified in 2002, about 8% were achieving attainment of standards by the end of FY 2011.
Learn more »

EPA approved 92% of water quality standard revisions submitted by States and Territories in FY 2011 (commitment-85%).
Learn more »

Water QualityWater Quality

In 2011, 2,846 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) were established and approved by EPA. Over 46,000 TMDLs have been completed since 1996.
A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing pollutants in order to attain water quality standards. The terms "approved" and "established" refer to the completion and approval of the TMDL itself.
Learn more »

EPA and States made significant gains in documenting the full or partial restoration of waterbodies that are impaired primarily by non-point sources. Nationally, EPA and States exceeded their commitment (251) with 358 waterbodies that were partially or fully restored.
Learn more »

Water QualityWater Quality

For the fifth consecutive year, EPA and States achieved the national goal of having current NPDES permits in place for 105,922 of non-Tribal facilities (FY 2011 commitment–100,680).
Learn more »

Ninety-eight percent (98%) of funds available under the Clean Water State Revolving Fund have been committed to loans to local communities for wastewater or watershed projects.
Learn more »

Water QualityWater Quality

EPA has been working with states to structure their permit programs to better support comprehensive protection of water quality. A key strategy is to focus efforts on high-priority permits that need to be issued or reissued to help implement TMDLs (total maximum daily loads), watershed plans, effluent guidelines, or other environmental and programmatic actions. In 2011, both EPA and authorized states issued 1,005 priority permits (132% of the universe), exceeding the national commitment of 763 permits (100%)
Learn more »

Coastal/Ocean ProtectionCoastal and Oceans

EPA's percent of annual commitments met for protecting coastal and ocean resources stayed the same in 2011. EPA 's percent of commitments met for this subobjective has averaged 89% over the past 5 years.
Learn more »

EPA's Coastal and Ocean Protection programs saw a slight increase in resources in FY 2011.
Learn more »

Coastal/Ocean ProtectionCoastal and Oceans

The 28 National Estuary Programs (NEPs) and their partners protected or restored over 60,000 acres of habitat within the NEP study areas—almost 40,000 acres short of EPA's goal of 100,000 acres. Several factors are responsible for the decline in results over the past two years including an economic downturn that has made it difficult for the NEP partners to come up with the matching funds for projects. The 28 NEPs and their partners protected or restored over one million habitat acres within the NEP study areas since 2002.

Learn more »

Mexico BorderU.S.-Mexico Border

The U.S.-Mexico Border program significantly improved its performance over the past year. The Border program has removed 108 million pounds of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) loadings to waterbodies in the U.S.–Mexico Border area since FY 2003.
Learn more »

Mexico BorderU.S.-Mexico Border

EPA provided access to safe drinking water for 2,600 additional homes in the U.S.–Mexico Border area achieving its FY 2011 commitment of 2,000 additional homes.
Learn more »

EPA provided adequate wastewater sanitation to an additional 250,000 homes over the past year achieving its FY 2011 commitment (207,000 additional homes).
Learn more »

             

Great LakesGreat Lakes

The Great Lakes National program continued to receive a historically high level of funding in FY 2011. Despite a significant increase in the number of new measures being reported in FY 2011, the program was able to maintain a consistently high level of performance with 67% of measures meeting their commitments.
Learn more »

             

Great LakesGreat Lakes

EPA collaborated extensively with state and federal partners to conduct projects supporting the removal of 26 beneficial use impairments at Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Examples of impairments removed include restrictions on drinking water on the Detroit River and beach closings on the Kalamazoo River.
Learn more »

EPA, States and other partners remediated 8.4 million cubic yards of contaminated sediments through 2010 including more than 1.1 million cubic yards for the most recent year reported.
Learn more »

             

Chesapeake BayChesapeake Bay

EPA's Chesapeake Bay Program was unable to report on most of its performance measures in FY 2011 due to the fact that the measure language and FY 2011 commitments were no longer applicable under the requirements of a new TMDL established for the Bay watershed in December 2010. The program has developed new indicators for tracking the implementation of nutrient and sediment reduction actions.
Learn more »

             

Chesapeake BayChesapeake Bay

Underwater Bay Grass Abundance

Based on annual monitoring from the prior year, the Bay Program reported 79,550 acres of underwater grasses in the Chesapeake Bay. This represents approximately 43% of the Bay program's long-term goal of 185,000 acres.
Learn more »

             

Gulf of MexicoGulf of Mexico

EPA met three of its four commitments for the Gulf of Mexico program in FY 2011.  According to the recently published National Coastal Condition Report (IV) based on data collected from 2003-2006, the overall health of coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico maintained a rating of Fair/Poor. The hurricanes of 2005 (Katrina and Rita) significantly affected the data collected and influenced the overall health condition score. 
Learn more »

             

Gulf of MexicoGulf of Mexico

Area of Mid-Summer Bottom Water Hypoxia

The size of the hypoxic, or "dead," zone in the Gulf of Mexico decreased from 8,000 square miles in 2010 to 6,764 square miles in 2011. There were a number of hydrological, climate, and monitoring factors that lead to variability in the size of the hypoxic zone from year to year.
Learn more »

Gulf of MexicoGulf of Mexico

The Gulf of Mexico Program restored water and habitat quality to 116 impaired water segments in 13 priority areas in FY 2011 which was a 40% increase over FY 2010 results.

 

Long Island SoundLong Island Sound

EPA's performance was mixed in FY 2011 in restoring and protecting the Long Island Sound. EPA fell short of its 2011 goal of reopening 92% of 50 additional river and stream miles to migrating fish passage.
Learn more »

         

Long Island SoundLong Island Sound

The frequency of hypoxia in Long Island Sound bottom waters

In 2011, the duration of hypoxia in Long Island Sound was 54 days and the area affected was 130 square miles. This was an increase in the duration and size of the hypoxia zone from 2010.
Learn more »

               

Puget SoundPuget Sound

EPA's performance for restoring and protecting the Puget Sound declined for the first time in four years.  Failure to meet annual targets for restoring harvestable shellfish beds and remediation of contaminated sediments accounted for the shortfall. One of the performance highlights in 2011 was the restoration of over 14,600 acres of tidally- and seasonally-influenced estuarine wetlands the Puget Sound Basin since FY 2006. The program significantly exceeded its 2011 commitment (12,363) due to the fruition of a number of habitat protection projects funded in 2007-2009.
Learn more »

             

Puget SoundPuget Sound

In 2011, 4,037 acres of shellfish bed growing areas were placed under new harvest restrictions primarily due to pathogen pollution in Puget Sound's Jamish Bay. As a result, EPA, state, local, and tribal partners fell short of their annual goal of maintaining 4,953 acres of harvestable shellfish beds. 
Learn more »

       

Columbia RiverColumbia River

EPA has met two of its three commitments for the Columbia River subobjective in FY 2011. Working with EPA and other partners, the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership protected, enhanced, or restored an additional 361 acres of wetland and upland habitat in the Lower Columbia River watershed in FY 2011 for a total of 16,661 acres since FY 2006.  These restored wetlands and habitats provide significant benefits for salmon recovery, toxic reduction, and overall water quality in the Columbia River critical estuarine environment.
Learn more »

American Indian Drinking Water and Water Quality Performance

In its first year of reporting, EPA in coordination with other federal agencies, fell just short of reaching its FY 2011 commitment of 100,700 American Indian and Alaska Native homes with access to safe drinking water. The Agency and its partners, however, exceeded its FY 2011 commitment by 9% in providing access to basic sanitation to nearly 57,000 American Indian or Alaska Native homes.

Learn more »

             

Summary

  • About two-thirds of Water Program measures met their commitments in FY 2011, somewhat below the previous year's results.
  • Coastal and Oceans and Drinking Water subobjectives are among the most consistent high performers for core programs.
    • Wetlands and U.S.-Mexico Border subobjectives saw significant improvement in FY 2011.
    • South Florida, Pacific Island and Puget Sound showed a decline in performance over FY 2010.
  • Reversing the previous year's trend, the core programs were more successful than the place-based programs in meeting their commitments in 2011.
  • For the second year in a row, Regions 1 and 2 were the most successful in meeting their commitments in 2011.
  • Tribal commitments showed an improvement in FY 2011 over the previous year.
water

Jump to main content.