Technology Transfer Network / NAAQS
Ozone Implementation
Modification of the Ozone Monitoring Season for Washington and Oregon
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
Federal Register Document
Related Material
- Other Related Documents
[Federal Register: January 20, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 12)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3028-3030]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ja99-10]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 58
[ORWA-010799-a; FRL-6220-3]
Modification of the Ozone Monitoring Season for Washington and
Oregon
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending 40 CFR
part 58, Appendix D, section 2.5, to shorten the ozone monitoring
season in Washington and Oregon from April 1 through October 31 to May
1 through September 30.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective on March 22, 1999 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 19,
1999. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: Chris Hall, Office
of Air Quality (OAQ-107), EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101.
Copies of material submitted to EPA may be examined during normal
business hours at the following locations: EPA, Region 10, Office of
Air Quality, 1200 Sixth Avenue (OAQ-107), Seattle, Washington 98101,
and at Washington's Department of Ecology.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Hall, Office of Air Quality
(OAQ-107), EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101,
(206) 553-1949.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 9, 1998, EPA released a new guidance document concerning
ozone monitoring season selection and modification (``Guideline for
Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an 8-Hour
Ozone Standard,'' July 9, 1998. EPA-454/R-98-001). In the guidance,
EPA's Office for Air Quality Planning and Standards (``OAQPS'')
evaluated the ozone monitoring data and seasons for each state, and
provided a methodology for calculating new ozone monitoring seasons.
On November 19, 1998, the Washington Department of Ecology
(Ecology) submitted a request to EPA Region 10 to shorten its ozone
monitoring season per the guidance document's process and
recommendations. Currently the ozone monitoring season for Washington
is April 1 through October 31, as required by federal regulations which
can be found in the ``Ozone Monitoring Season by State'' table found in
40 CFR part 58, Appendix D section 2.5, and as required by State
Implementation Plan for Washington as approved by EPA. Since 1990 there
has been no exceedance of the 8-hour NAAQS (0.08 ppm) in Oregon or
Washington during the months of April and October. Ecology requested
that EPA modify the monitoring season to May through September, in
accordance with EPA's guidance.
A similar letter of request was submitted by the Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ) on December 1, 1998. In response to an
earlier request from DEQ, EPA already had approved a modification of
the Oregon 1-hour ozone monitoring season from May 1 through September
30. EPA's guidance suggested that a similar
[[Page 3029]]
monitoring period of May 1 through September 30 for the 8-hour standard
would capture the high ozone values occurring during the spring and
summer seasons in Oregon. EPA and DEQ analysis of monitoring data for
the 11-year period dating back to 1988 found no exceedances during the
months of April or October at Oregon ozone monitoring sites.
II. Summary of Action
EPA is approving a modification to Oregon and Washington's ozone
monitoring season. Under the change approved by this notice, the new
season will begin on May 1 and end on September 30. EPA Region 10 is
taking this action at the request of DEQ and Ecology after reviewing
all ambient ozone monitoring data 1 for both Oregon and
Washington over the past nine seasons (1990 though 1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For this review EPA Region 10 used all available data as
entered into EPA's Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA Region 10 has determined that this review meets the standards
of EPA guidance provided in the July 9, 1998 ``Guideline for Selecting
and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an 8-Hour Ozone
Standard.'' This guidance provides a basis for adjusting the months in
which ozone monitoring for the 8-hour ozone standard is required.
Analyses provided in the July 9, 1998, EPA guidance showed that between
1990 and 1995 no excursions of the 8-hour ozone standard had occurred
at any of the monitoring sites in Oregon or Washington during the
months of April or October, and conclude that ozone monitoring during
these two months could be discontinued. EPA Region 10 agrees with the
analyses of DEQ and Ecology with regard to the months of April and
October. Based on the historical data review, the analysis of
information contained in EPA's July 9, 1998, guidance, and the
information provided by DEQ and Ecology in their requests, EPA Region
10 has determined that discontinuing monitoring in Oregon and
Washington during the months of April and October will not result in
the potential to miss days in which the 8-hour ozone standard is
exceeded, and will result in significant cost savings for both
agencies.
EPA notes that the analysis in the OAQPS guidance found no
excursions of the 8-hour standard in Washington for the month of
September, and suggested that monitoring in Washington could
potentially be discontinued during this month as well. EPA Region 10's
analysis of Washington ozone monitoring data through September 1998
found one recorded excursion on September 1, 1998 (Tacoma). QA
validation of this record had not yet been finalized. Additionally, EPA
notes that Oregon and Washington share an ozone maintenance area
(Vancouver-Portland), and that a number of excursions have been
recorded at ozone monitoring sites in Oregon during September over the
past nine seasons. Therefore, EPA Region 10 and Ecology believe that
ozone monitoring data should continue to be collected during the month
of September given the likelihood future excursions of the 8-hour
standard in Washington could occur.
By this notice, EPA Region 10 is agreeing with the conclusions of
DEQ and Ecology that ambient ozone monitoring in April and October can
be discontinued. EPA believes that reductions in the required schedule
will provide significant cost savings for both state agencies without
reducing the effectiveness of their ozone monitoring program.
EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective March 22, 1999
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by
February 19, 1999.
If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on March 22, 1999 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
III. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review.
B. Executive Order 12875
Under Executive Order 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by
statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local or tribal
government, unless the federal government provides the funds necessary
to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those governments, or
EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting,
Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to the Office of
Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected state, local and tribal
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected
officials and other representatives of state, local and tribal
governments to provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.
Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local or tribal
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875
do not apply to this rule.
C. Executive Order 13045
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is
determined to be economically significant as defined under E.O. 12866,
and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has
reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children,
and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered
by the Agency. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it is
does not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or
safety risks.
D. Executive Order 13084
Under Executive Order 13084, Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
[[Page 3030]]
costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, Executive Order 13084
requires EPA to provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the
regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop
an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of Indian tribal governments to provide meaningful and
timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters that
significantly or uniquely affect their communities. Today's rule does
not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal
governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of E.O.
13084 do not apply to this rule.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create
any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the federal-state relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate,
or to the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205,
EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent
with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a
plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that this approval action does not include a
federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of $100
million or more to either state, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This federal action approves
preexisting requirements under state or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
H. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 22, 1999. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 58
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Oregon,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Washington.
Dated: January 7, 1999.
Chuck Clarke,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
Part 58, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 58--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 58 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Part 58, Appendix D, section 2.5: the table is amended by
revising the entry for Oregon and Washington to read as follows:
Appendix D--Network Design for State and Local Air Monitoring
Stations (SLAMS) and National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS) and
Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)
* * * * *
2.5 Ozone (O3) Design Criteria for SLAMS
* * * * *
Ozone Monitoring Season by State
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Begin Month End Month
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Oregon.......................... May............... September
* * * * *
Washington...................... May............... September
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 99-1121 Filed 1-19-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P