Jump to main content.


Chapter 2 - Quantitative Research Findings and Implications (cont.)

15. For the three product categories, respondents indicated that the following information is important, and they would like to locate it easily:

  • Directions for use,
  • Description of what the product does,
  • Description of where not to use the product,
  • Information about effects on personal and children's health (except for cleaners users), and
  • Emergency information.

Table 2-10: What Information Found on the Packaging of Products Is Most Important to You?
Indoor Insecticide Household Cleaner Outdoor Pesticide
Directions on how to use the product 80% Directions on how to use the product 83% Directions on how to use the product 85%
Description of what the product does 69% Description of what the product does 72% Description of what the product does 73%
Information about effects on personal and children's health or safety 49% Information about where the product should not be used 52% Information about effects on personal and children's health or safety 48%
Information on what to do in an emergency or in case of an accident 45% Brand Name 49% Information about where the product should not be used 46%
Information about where the product should not be used 42% Information on what to do in an emergency or in case of an accident 48% Information on what to do in an emergency or in case of an accident 35%
(Base = All Respondents)
 

16. In all three product categories, respondents always indicated that the least important information to them on current labels was the positive environmental claims statements (e.g., contains no CFCs, contains no phosphates) and the name of the manufacturer. In all three product categories, respondents ranked label information about disposal, storage, ingredients, and a consumer information phone number as the least important.

Summary bar graph of items never read by the consumers surveyed.  General order is 40%-50% phone information; 25-39% environmental claims; 15-21% ingredients; 15-20% manufacturer; 10-22% disposal information; 5-12% storage information

 
Table 2-11: Summary of Items Never Read (%)
  Indoor Insecticide Household Cleaner Outdoor Pesticide
Phone for Info 46 51 41
Positive Environmental Claims: No CFCs/ Phosphates or Water Based 39 39 26
Ingredients 22 22 15
Manufacturer 21 20 15
Disposal Info 17 24 11
Storage Info 11 15 6
(Base = All Respondents)
 

17. For outdoor pesticides and indoor insecticides, respondents consistently indicated that they do not read or give importance to statements on environmental claims (e.g., contains no CFCs).

18. In all three product categories, there is a similarity between the label information perceived to be the most important and the information that respondents indicated that they wish to find most easily. The top three (in order of preference) are: (1) directions for use, (2) a description of what the product does, and (3) precautionary statements related to human health (please see Table 2-10).

Table 2-12: What Information Do You Want to Be Able to Find Most Easily?
Indoor Insecticide Household Cleaner Outdoor Pesticide
Directions on how to use the product 69% Directions on how to use the product 72% Directions on how to use the product 76%
Description of what the product does 57% Description of what the product does 61% Description of what the product does 63%
Information on what to do in an emergency or in case of an accident 47% Information on what to do in an emergency or in case of an accident 49% Information about where the product should not be used 44%
Information about effects on personal and children's health or safety 43% Information about where the product should not be used 44% Information about effects on personal and children's health or safety 43%
Information about where the product should not be used 36% Information about effects on personal and children's health or safety 39% Information on what to do in an emergency or in case of an accident 41%
(Base = All Respondents)

Table 2-13: When Deciding Which Product to Purchase, Which of the Following Types of Information, If Any, Do You Look for?
Indoor Insecticide Household Cleaner Outdoor Pesticide
Product characteristics, such as non-staining, non-corrosive, won't scratch surface, low odor, etc. 63% Product characteristics, such as non-staining, non-corrosive, won't scratch surface, low odor, etc. 81% Will not harm wildlife, pets, fish 52%
Will not harm wildlife, pets, fish 56% Non-flammable 44% Low potential for harming plants 49%
Non-flammable 42% Container or packaging characteristics 23% Low potential for contaminating ground water 48%
Low potential for harming plants 41% No phosphates 17% Packaging allows for reduced contact with the product 40%
Packaging allows for reduced contact with the product 33% No CFCs 13% Non-flammable 36%
(Base = All Respondents)


Implications Regarding Respondents' Hierarchy of Importance of Information on Product Labels

A. Consumers regularly looked for the information that they regard as important: the product purpose and personal precautionary information.

B. People want to be able to find information they regard as important quickly. Any modifications of the label should allow this information to be easily identifiable.

C. Respondents were less concerned about label information relating to storage and environmental issues, including disposal information, environmental claims, and environmental effects.

Findings on Label Format (Chart 2-7, Table 2-14)

19. After being given a description of different formats, respondents in all three product categories preferred a box format on the label, like the nutrition facts box, that presents information consistently among products in the same category.

A bar graph which shows the answers to the question 'Which way would you most like to see information shown?'  For all three categories, 'Box format' was preferred with 35%-42%; 'Key facts highlighted' got 22-30%; 'Does not make a difference' was 18-22%; 'would not change' 7-10%; 'no answer' averaged 5%; and 'none of the above' rated 3%

Table 2-14: Which Way Would You Most Like to See The Information Shown? (%)
 

Does not make a difference

Would not Change Key Facts High-lighted Box Format None of Above No Answer
Outdoor Pesticide n=846 18 8 29 39 2 4
Household Cleaner n=894 23 6 23 42 2 3
Indoor Insecticide n=889 18 10 30 34 2 5
(Base = All Respondents)


Implications Regarding Label Format

A. Label comprehension can be improved by using standard formats.

B. Ease of use encourages more frequent label reading.

 

Findings on Respondents' Preference for FIFRA versus Non-FIFRA Product Labels (Chart 2-8, Chart 2-9)(1)

20. Over half of the respondents in the household cleaner category preferred the FIFRA label (the type of label appearing on EPA registered products), including the overall label and the subparts on directions for use, where the product should not be used, effects on personal health, ingredients, storage, disposal, and emergency information, over the non-FIFRA label (labels appearing on non-registered, but similar, products).

Chart 2-8, a pie chart which asks 'Which of the two product packages has the type of information you prefer? (household cleaner)'. Answers, FIFRA Type 57%, Non-FIFRA type 33%, and no preference 10%

Chart2-9; pie chart that asks 'For each type of information, which do you prefer regarding product contents or ingredients?' FIFRA 58%, No preference 26%, Non-FIFRA 16%

Implications Regarding Respondents' Preferability for FIFRA versus Non-FIFRA Product Labels

A. Consumers desire specific types of information to appear on the product label.

 

Findings on Storage and Disposal Information (Chart 2-10, Chart 2-11, Chart 2-12, Table 2-15, Table 2-16, Table 2-17)

21. Outdoor pesticide and indoor insecticide users read the storage and disposal information significantly more than household cleaner respondents.

22. The most frequent reasons given for not reading storage and disposal information in the store was that it is "information they already know," followed by "just don't read it."

Reasons why never read indoor insecticide labels. (please check table below for answers)

Table 2-15: Reasons Why Never Read Indoor Insecticides (%)
  Just Do Not Do Not Understand Already Know Do Not Need to Know Do Not Have Time Print Too Small No Answer
Disposal (150) 40 0 35 19 1 3 5
Storage (102) 25 1 48 10 2 4 17
Contents/
Ingredients (200)
29 27 3 29 2 3 13
(Base = All Indoor Pesticide Respondents Who Said They Never Read Storage & Disposal, and Ingredients Information, Out of a Total of 889 Indoor Pesticide Respondents)
 

Reasons why never read household cleaner labels. (please check table below for answers)

Table 2-16: Reasons Why Never Read Household Cleaner (%)
  Just Do Not Do Not Understand Already Know Do Not Need to Know Do Not Have Time Print Too Small No Answer
Disposal (216) 38 0 32 19 3 4 9
Storage (131) 21 1 39 20 6 3 15
Contents/
Ingredients (201)
31 15 10 31 4 3 11
(Base = All Household Cleaner Respondents Who Said They Never Read Storage & Disposal, and Ingredients Information, Out of a Total of 894 Household Cleaner Respondents)
 

Reasons why never read outdoor insecticide labels. (please check table below for answers)

Table 2-17: Reasons Why Never Read Outdoor Insecticides (%)
  Just Do Not Do Not Understand Already Know Do Not Need to Know Do Not Have Time Print Too Small No Answer
Disposal (93) 50 1 28 14 5 4 5
Storage (54) 28 0 30 13 2 6 26
Contents/
Ingredients (127)
22 33 3 32 3 6 10
(Base = All Outdoor Pesticide Respondents Who Said They Never Read Storage & Disposal, and Ingredients Information, Out of a Total of 846 Outdoor Pesticide Respondents )
 

23. The following represents the findings of an "open-ended" question regarding methods of disposal:(2)

  • In all three categories, most respondents disposed of pesticides and cleaner products or packages in the trash;
  • Household cleaner users recycled more frequently than those responding in the indoor and outdoor product categories;
  • One in ten outdoor pesticide users disposed through special collections, which is more than users of indoor insecticides and cleaners;
  • Less than 10% overall used special collections;
  • Cleaner users found it acceptable to dispose of products/residues down the drain;
  • Few users indicated that they disposed of products down the drain or diluted and used them up; and
  • Virtually no consumers said they call the city or county for disposal advice;

24. There were no significant differences in responses from respondents in the states with strong household hazardous waste programs, versus those respondents from states that do not have strong household hazardous wastes programs.

Implications Regarding Storage and Disposal Information

A. Storage and disposal issues are of low priority and are not important to consumers.

Findings on Recycling Claims and Symbols (Chart 2-13, Table 2-18)

25. A high percentage of survey participants responded either "Not really sure" or gave an incorrect response for every question under each symbol. This was true even allowing for local recycling programs that might make some answers correct for panelists in those localities.

1. Non-FIFRA labels do not exist for the indoor insecticides and outdoor pesticides product categories.

2. It is not known whether respondents were referring to the disposal of containers, unused product, or both.

[Go to next section]

Publications | Glossary | A-Z Index | Jobs


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.