Jump to main content.


Progress Report of the Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods: VII. Terrestrial Risk Assessment

On this Page


Table 1: Uncertainty Associated with Laboratory Toxicity Tests
Identified Uncertainty Uncertainty Class Function Quantifiable Reducible
Measurement error Parameter error
  • Dose, diet preparation
  • Endpoint measurement
Yes (not usually done) Somewhat
Inter-test variation Natural stochasticity
  • Environmental conditions
  • Stock of test animals
  • Condition of animals
  • Inherent sensitivity differences among test animal populations
Maybe (historical data bases of LD50s and slopes) Somewhat
Lack of fit of statistical model to data Natural stochasticity Limitations of test design involving limited number of doses and animals Yes (confidence intervals) Possible (not feasible?)
Intra-specific variation (within test population) Natural stochasticity Inherent differences in sensitivity among individuals of the test population Yes (slope of dose-response) No
Behavioral and physiological responses Natural stochasticity or model error
  • Food consumption measurement
  • Repellency
  • Regurgitation
Yes Somewhat (qualitative observations; quantify residues)

Top of page


Table 2: Uncertainty Associated with Extrapolations
Identified Uncertainty Uncertainty Class Function Quantifiable Reducible
Interspecific variability Natural stochasticity
  • Inherent differences in sensitivity and behavior
  • Inherent differences in slope of dose-response
Yes (historical data of LD50s and slopes) Somewhat
Extrapolations to no- or low- effect levels Model error
  • Test designed to estimate median lethal dose or concentrations
  • Limitations of design, few doses or animals
  • Some cases
  • Some cases
  • Somewhat
  • Somewhat
Extrapolation across taxonomic classes (e.g., mammal for avian) Natural stochasticity and model error Inadequacy of animal model Maybe (if historical data or pharmacokinetic models justify extrapolation) Possible (not feasible?)
Intra-specific variability Natural stochasticity Differences in captive and wild animals Maybe Yes?
Extrapolation to field scenarios Model error
  • Differences in exposure (e.g., differences in feeding patterns)
  • Differences in sensitivity
  • Maybe
  • Not likely
  • Yes
  • No
Extrapolation to populations or communities Natural stochasticity or model error
  • Population dynamics (e.g., density dependence)
  • Indirect effects
  • Maybe via models
  • Limited theoretical and empirical basis
Yes, if measurements occur at each level of organization

Top of page


Publications | Glossary | A-Z Index | Jobs


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.