Summary
In accordance with Section 309(g) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1319(g), and the Consolidated Rules of Practice at 40 C.F.R. Part 22, notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement, recorded in a Consent Agreement and Proposed Final Order (“Proposed Consent Agreement”), between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (“EPA”), and Nor-Cal Rock Inc. (“Respondent”) to resolve the following civil administrative penalty proceeding under Section 309(g).
On July 24, 2018, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.13(b) and 22.18(b)(2) and (3), Complainant and Respondent entered into a Proposed Consent Agreement to simultaneously commence and conclude this CWA Class I civil administrative penalty proceeding. The Proposed Consent Agreement requires Respondent to pay to the United States an administrative civil penalty of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00).
Payment of this penalty will resolve EPA’s allegations that the Respondent violated Sections 301(a) of the CWA by failing to file for permit coverage and implement best management practices to comply with the State of California’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (the Permit) at Nor-Cal Rock’s Oakland aggregate base material facility (“Facility”) from on or around July 15, 2015 through December 13, 2017.
In the Matter of Nor-Cal Rock Inc.
Docket No. CWA-09-2018-0013
Complainant: Thanne Berg, Acting Assistant Director, Enforcement Division, U.S. EPA, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Respondent: Nor-Cal Rock Inc., 477 Roland Way, Oakland, CA 94621.
Description of Business or Activity Conducted by the Respondent: Respondent operates a concrete and asphalt recycling plant and engages in the crushing, grinding, pulverizing and preparation of miscellaneous nonmetallic minerals.
Alleged Violations: During a March 2017 stormwater inspection, EPA found that the Respondent had failed to file a Notice of Intent for permit coverage and implement adequate minimum stormwater best management practices in accordance with the Permit at its Facility. EPA inspectors observed inadequate erosion and sediment controls, unsatisfactory material handling and waste management practices, and uncontained raw material stockpiles throughout the facility. The inspectors also found two discharge locations from the facility: (1) the northern part of the facility directly into Peralta Creek; and (2) from the facility entrance to a storm drain inlet located .08 miles away on 46th Avenue at Coliseum Way, which is connected to the Alameda County MS4 and flows directly to Peralta Creek. Stormwater from Peralta Creek discharge into the San Leandro Bay near 50th Avenue.
Proposed Order and Penalty: $15,000.