Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Clear Skies

Clear Skies in New Hampshire

Information provided for informational purposes onlyNote: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
Unless otherwise noted, the data presented throughout this Web site reflect EPA’s 2003 modeling and analysis of the Clear Skies Act of 2003. Clear Skies legislation was intended to create a mandatory program that would dramatically reduce power plant emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and mercury by setting a national cap on each pollutant. The Clear Skies bill was proposed in response to a growing need for an emission reduction plan that will protect human health and the environment while providing regulatory certainty to the industry. The proposed legislation for air regulation never moved out of the Senate Environment and Public Works committee in 2005 and was therefore never enacted.
You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.

572KB PDF Version (13 pages)

Highlights of Clear Skies in New Hampshire

New Hampshire
  • New Hampshire already has in place state requirements that will substantially reduce emissions of SO2 and NOx in the State.
  • Clear Skies achieves additional emission reductions in New Hampshire; New Hampshire sources would reduce emissions of SO2 by 45%, NOx by 21%, and mercury by 20% by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
  • The health benefits in New Hampshire would total $290 million annually ($55 million under the alternative estimate) and include for the New England region approximately 500 fewer premature deaths (290 under the alternative estimate) and 860 fewer hospitalizations/emergency room visits each year.
  • In addition, New Hampshire would receive environmental benefits, including improved visibility and reduced acidic deposition.

Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health and the Environment

Why Clear Skies?

  • Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist.
    • New Hampshire's citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution, including asthma attacks and premature death
  • Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
    • Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative to other sources
    • Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome regulations

Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach

  • Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions -- beginning years before full implementation
    • New Hampshire sources would substantially reduce emissions of SO2 and NOx
    • Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical health and environmental goals
  • Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives for innovation
    • Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints, allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances while lowering risks to the public
    • Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable continued reliance on coal
  • Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators, and consumers

Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex Set of Requirements

Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex Set of Requirements

For a larger image, click here.

Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions

The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current Act.

2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern States + D.C.)

2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap assigned to two Zones with trading programs)

2010:

  • Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading program)
  • SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading program)

2018:

  • Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
  • Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national trading program)
  • Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a national trading program)

Emissions in New Hampshire under Clear Skies

Emissions in New Hampshire (2020) would be reduced from 2000 levels:

  • 93% reduction in SO2 emissions from 2000 levels
  • 66% reduction in NOx emissions from 2000 levels
  • 20% decrease in mercury emissions from the base case

These NOx and SO2 reductions are mostly attributable to the state regulation.

Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in New Hampshire in 2010 and 2020

Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in New Hampshire in 2010 and 2020 -- Sulfur dioxide

Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in New Hampshire in 2010 and 2020 -- Nitrogen oxides

Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in New Hampshire  in 2010 and 2020 -- Mercury

Note: The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations to implement the current air quality standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not yet been promulgated.

Clear Skies Health and Air Quality Benefits in New Hampshire

By 2020, New Hampshire would receive approximately $290 million in annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle and ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies. (see note 1)

Improve Public Health

  • Throughout the New England region, reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result in public health benefits of:
    • approximately 500 fewer premature deaths each year (see note 1)
    • approximately 320 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each year
    • approximately 1,100 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
    • approximately 860 fewer hospital and emergency room visits each year
    • approximately 57,000 fewer days workers are out sick due to respiratory symptoms each year
    • approximately 4,600 fewer school absences each year
  • Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified benefits to those who eat fish from New Hampshire's lakes and streams.

Help Maintain Health-Based Air Quality Standards (see note 2)

  • All counties in New Hampshire currently meet the 8-hour ozone and fine particle standards.
  • Clear Skies would further reduce concentrations of ozone and fine particles throughout New Hampshire.

* These results are based on modeling the Clear Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.

Emission Reductions under Clear Skies

Emissions in states surrounding New Hampshire would decrease considerably. These emission reductions would make it much easier for New Hampshire to comply with the national air quality standards.

Projected SO2 Emissions from Power Plants with the Base Case and Clear Skies (2020) Northeast

Projected NOx Emissions from Power Plants with the Base Case and Clear Skies (2020) Northeast

Note: The base case in IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not yet been promulgated. Emissions projected for new units in 2020 are not reflected.

Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in New Hampshire

Projected Changes in Sulfur Deposition with the Base Case in 2020 Compared to 2001.

Projected Changes in Sulfur Deposition with Clear Skies and the Base Case in 2020 Compared to 2001

Clear Skies Would Provide Substantial Environmental Benefits in New Hampshire

In comparison to existing programs,

  • Visibility would improve perceptibly in much of the state, including the White Mountain National Forest region.
    • The value of improved visibility for New Hampshire residents who visit National Parks and Wilderness areas nationwide would be $13 million each year by 2020.
  • Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease by 15-30% across most of the state.
  • Nitrogen deposition, another significant contributor to acid rain as well as a cause of damage in nitrogen-sensitive forests and coastal waters, would decrease by up to 20% throughout New Hampshire.
  • Mercury deposition would decrease by up to 5% across the state.*

* These results are based on modeling the Clear Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.

Electricity Generation and Pollution Controls in New Hampshire under Clear Skies

Current and Projected Generation in New Hampshire under Clear Skies(GWh).

New Hampshire's electricity growth is projected to be met by increases in gas-fired and coal-fired generation. Clear Skies does not significantly alter this projection.

  • Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase by 7% from 1999 to 2020.

The major generation companies in New Hampshire include:

    • Public Service Company of NH
  • Total coal-fired capacity in New Hampshire is projected to be 521 MW in 2010

New Hampshire's sources are projected to reduce their emissions through the use of existing pollution controls, rather than through a switch from coal to natural gas.

  • In 2010 and 2020, 100% of New Hampshire's coal-fired generation is projected to come from units with advanced SO2 and/or NOx control equipment that also substantially reduce mercury emissions.
  • No pollution controls are projected to be installed in New Hampshire under Clear Skies.

Current and Projected Coal Production for Electricity Generation

Electricity Prices in New Hampshire under Clear Skies

  • With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) NPCC region (the electricity supply region that contains New Hampshire) are projected to increase between 2005 and 2020.
  • With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be approximately 0.5 - 2.7% higher between 2005 and 2020 than in the absence of the legislation.

NERC

Projected Retail Electricity Prices in New Hampshire under the Base Case and Clear Skies (2005-2020)

Projected National Retail Electricity Prices and Prices in New Hampshire under Clear Skies (2005-2020)

In 2000, the average retail electricity price in New Hampshire was approximately 11.6 cents/kWh, which was above the average national retail price of approximately 6.66 cents/kWh.

Note: The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not yet been promulgated.

Costs and Benefits in New Hampshire under Clear Skies

Benefits Outweigh the Costs

Clear Skies....
  • Guarantees significant emissions reductions - beginning years before full implementation
  • Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with incentives for innovation
  • Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators, and consumers
  • In New Hampshire, economic modeling projects that the cost of generating electricity, of which a component is the cost of installing and operating pollution controls, is less under Clear Skies than under the base case as power production shifts within the region to enable the power sector to comply in the most cost-effective manner. Total annual health benefits in 2020 for New Hampshire are projected to be $290 million.
  • Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999) are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually by 2020
    • An alternate estimate projects annual health benefits totaling $23 billion

Note: Costs include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement of the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs or savings that could be associated with allowance movement between sources.

Notes on EPA's Analysis

  • The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
    • EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
      • Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
      • Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated rules at the state and federal level since the initial analysis was undertaken.
    • The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety valve feature
  • This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and benefits of Agency rulemakings.
    • The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs only:
      • Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
    • The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
      • Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific caps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before March 2003.
    • For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.

Clear Skies


1. An alternative methodology for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately 500 premature deaths prevented and $1.2 billion in health benefits each year in New Hampshire by 2020.

2. Based on 1999-2001 data of counties with monitors that have three years of complete data.

State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.

Back to top
top

Jump to main content.