|
Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Although the information provided here was accurate and current when first created, it is now outdated. |
(Revised 9/3/98)
REGULATORY MECHANISMS FOR ACHIEVING PESTICIDE RISK MANAGEMENT
| Outcomes | Consensual Approach* | Agency Action if Consensus Cannot Be Reached |
| 1. Changes in Use Reflected in Label
Changes.
e.g.,
|
Registrant submits application for amendment to registration. Registrant submits request for modification of tolerance. |
"NOIC Unless" - The Agency
issues Notice of Intent to Cancel unless label changes are made.
Modification of tolerances. |
| 2. Change to Conditions of
Registration.
e.g.,
|
SAME AS #1ABOVE. There could be tolerance revocation during suspended animation. |
|
| 3. Elimination of Use(s).
e.g.,
|
Registrant submits request for voluntary cancellation under FIFRA section
6(f). Registrant submits request for tolerance revocation if food use. |
NOIC Use(s): The Agency issues Notice of Intent to Cancel use(s). Tolerance revocation of food use. |
| 4. Elimination of Active Ingredient. | SAME AS #3
(All registrants must do this) |
|
5. Phase-Out: Delayed Elimination of Use(s)
or Active Ingredient.
|
SAME AS #3 and #4, except registrant submits a "conditional FIFRA section 6(f)". Registrant will agree to voluntarily cancel provided they get a phase-out. | SAME AS #3 or #4. |
* A consensual approach requires that every affected registrant agrees.
TRAC Home
| OPP Home |
EPA Home |
Comments
Site Map |
Search OPP |
Search EPA
www.epa.gov/oppfead1/trac/regmech.htm
updated April 11, 1999