|
Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Although the information provided here was accurate and current when first created, it is now outdated. |
TRAC 5/28-29/98
| Interim Decision Logic
(described to FSAC1 in Dec.'96 and published in PR Notice 97-1) |
Consultation Opportunities2 |
Current operating policy |
| Aggregate Exposure.
Estimate exposure components (dietary, drinking water, residential) and risk, allocate portions of total aggregate risk to drinking water, residential, remainder to dietary exposure |
SAP3 December 10-11, 1997
SAP March 24-25, 1998 SAP May 5-6, 1998 ILSI4 November 1997 ILSI February 1998 |
Current approach still adds exposure from the three components. Tools/methods for estimating exposure are evolving and improving. |
| Risk Cup.
5% - 20% of risk cup reserved non-dietary exposure pathways (e.g., 10% for drinking water) |
SAP December 10-11, 1997
ILSI November 1997 ILSI February 1998 |
No longer reserving a percentage of the risk cup. For drinking water and residential (indoor and outdoor), using available data, and scientific methods and models. |
| Common Mechanism of Toxicity.
Assume common mechanism exists if a pesticide shares a toxicological endpoint and structural similarity with other substances. Any approvals will be time-limited or conditional. |
SAP December 10-11, 1997
SAP March 24-25, 1998 ILSI September 1998 |
Still largely applying interim logic, since in most cases
there is still no "available information" concerning
common mechanism that can be applied rationally to
science decisions.
OPs have been determined to share a common mechanism of toxicity. Need to develop a cumulative risk assessment methodology for considering all aggregate OP risks. |
| Regulatory Decisions.
Apply interim decision logic when data lacking to estimate specific exposures. If data available, it would be used to estimate exposure more precisely. Decision logic will be revised and updated once interim decisions revisited. |
SAP December 10-11, 1997
FSAC1 December 1996 |
Interim decision logic has evolved. Better exposure data and estimating techniques being incorporated into decisions. |
| FQPA Safety Factor (10X).
Retention, reduction or removal of the safety factor based primarily on completeness of the database as well as type and severity of the observed effect(s). |
SAP September 9-10, 1997
SAP March 24-25, 1998 SAP July 1998 SAB5 Fall 1998 PPDC6 April 16-17, 1998 |
Safety factor decisions are made considering all aspects of the pesticide's risk characterization, i.e., in addition to data, use and exposure are considered. |
| Probabilistic risk assessments/Monte Carlo/99.9%. | SAP September 9-10, 1997
SAP March 24-25, 1998 |
Agency is accepting Monte Carlos submitted by registrants according to draft guidance. Evaluating which percentile(s) (e.g., 99.9%) is the most appropriate for decision-making. |
TRAC Home
| OPP Home | EPA
Home | Comments
Site Map | Search OPP | Search EPA
www.epa.gov/pesticide/trac
updated May 26, 1998