Jump to main content.


Permethrin Facts
(Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Fact Sheet)

EPA 738-F-06-012
June 2006

Contents

Permethrin Facts :


Permethrin Home
Permethrin Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) (PDF, 195 pp, 3.2 MB, About PDF)

Pesticide Reregistration

All pesticides sold or distributed in the Unites States must be registered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), based on scientific studies showing that they can be used without posing unreasonable risks to people or the environment. Because of advances in scientific knowledge, the law requires that pesticides, which were first registered before November 1, 1984, be reregistered to ensure that they meet today’s more stringent standards.

In evaluating pesticides for reregistration, EPA obtains and reviews a complete set of studies from pesticide producers, describing the human health and environmental effects of each pesticide. To implement provisions of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996, EPA considered the special sensitivity of infants and children to pesticides, as well as aggregate exposure of the public to pesticide residues from all sources, and the cumulative effects of pesticides and other compounds with common mechanisms of toxicity. The Agency develops any mitigation measures or regulatory controls needed to effectively reduce each pesticide’s risks. EPA then registers pesticides that meet the safety standard of the FQPA and can be used without posing unreasonable risks to human health or the environment.

When a pesticide is eligible for reregistration, EPA explains the basis for its decision in a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) document. This fact sheet summarizes the information in the RED document for the pesticide permethrin, case 2510.

Top of page


Regulatory History

Permethrin was first registered and tolerances established in the United States in 1979 for use on cotton (April 29, 1979 44FR 24287). The registration was made conditional due to the need for additional toxicology and ecological effects data to fully evaluate carcinogenicity and aquatic risk, respectively. After additional toxicity data were reviewed, EPA concluded that permethrin was a weak carcinogen. Further, laboratory studies indicated that permethrin was highly toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates; therefore, it was classified as Restricted Use pesticide (RUP) for the cotton use. From 1982 to 1989, an additional 55 + crop tolerances were approved for a wide variety of crops, including various fruits and vegetables, meat, milk and eggs.

In 1985 a Data Call-In (DCI) for ecological effects data for permethrin was issued. After evaluation of this data EPA concluded that the current RUP classification be maintained for all products for wide area agricultural uses (except livestock and premises uses) and outdoor wide area non-crop uses because of the possible adverse effects on aquatic organisms from spray drift and runoff. In 1988 a comprehensive DCI was issued requiring additional residue chemistry, environmental fate and toxicological data. In 1994 the producers of products containing permethrin for use on cotton requested voluntary cancellation of this use. From 1994 thru 2000 permethrin was subject to specific DCIs requesting data to assess agricultural and residential exposure, agricultural re-entry, and mosquito ULV products.

Top of page


Uses

Top of page


Health Effects

Permethrin is a member of the pyrethroid class of pesticides. Similar to other pyrethroids, permethrin alters nerve function by modifying the normal biochemistry and physiology of nerve membrane sodium channels. However, EPA is not currently following a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity for the pyrethroids. Although all pyrethroids interact with sodium channels, there are multiple types of sodium channels and it is currently unknown whether the pyrethroids have similar effects on all channels. Nor do we have a clear understanding of effects on key downstream neuronal function e.g., nerve excitability, nor do we understand how these key events interact to produce their compound specific patterns of neurotoxicity. There is ongoing research by the EPA’s Office of Research and Development and pyrethroid registrants to evaluate the differential biochemical and physiological actions of pyrethroids in mammals. This research is expected to be completed by 2007. When available, the Agency will consider this research and make a determination of common mechanism as a basis for assessing cumulative risk. Therefore, the human health risk assessment and RED document only considered the effects of permethrin.

Additionally, the Agency classified permethrin as “Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans” by the oral route. This classification was based on two reproducible benign tumor types (lung and liver) in the mouse, equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in Long- Evans rats, and supporting structural activity relationship information.

Top of page


Risks

Dietary

Residential

Aggregate Risks

Occupational

Ecological Risks

Top of page


Risk Mitigation

To address assessed risks of concern, the following mitigation measures will be implemented.

Residential Risk

Occupational Risk

Handler

Post-Application

Ecological Risks

Risk/Benefit Balance Analysis

The Agency also assessed the significance of permethrin use, and conducted a risk/benefit balancing analysis. Given the significance of the use of permethrin and the mitigated nature of the risks of permethrin, the Agency believes, on balance, that the benefits of permethrin outweigh the risks. With respect to the ecological risks, the Agency has reduced those risks by imposing various conditions that should reduce exposure of aquatic species to permethrin. With respect to the benefits, permethrin offers substantial benefits to users. In the agricultural area, permethrin provides a high benefit to the agricultural industry because of its broad label and 1 day PHI. According to comments received from various growers, the broad spectrum of pests that permethrin targets makes its use highly beneficial since the agricultural industry has been losing a number of insecticides, and the newer insecticides replacing them have chemistries that target specific insects and are narrow in their spectrum. Further, permethrin has a 1 day pre-harvest interval, which allows for effective pest control near harvest of registered crops. Also alternatives to permethrin, such as the fourth generation pyrethroids, may pose a greater risk to aquatic organisms because of their persistence in the environment.

For the public health use, permethrin is the most widely used mosquito adulticide in the United States because of its low cost, high efficacy, and low incidence of pest resistance. Although permethrin alternatives are comparably priced and are likely to be as effective as permethrin in many situations, they are not likely to universally substitute for all permethrin uses because of labeling constraints or resistance concerns. The Agency believes that the loss of permethrin would adversely affect the ability of mosquito abatement professionals to control mosquitoes in some situation, such as agricultural-urban interface and areas with known resistance to alternatives. With regard to the treatment of fabrics, permethrin is the only pesticide registered to pre-treat fabrics, which the AFPMB strongly supports as a method of preventing many diseases that might afflict military personnel in the field. On other uses, such as residential uses, where there may be a potential for ecological effects due to urban runoff, the Agency intends to identify steps which can be taken to allow a greater understanding of potential ecological risk from urban uses of pyrethroid as a whole during Registration Review.

Data Requirements

The Agency has identified data necessary to confirm the reregistration eligibility decision for permethrin. These studies are listed below and will be included in the generic DCI for this RED, which the Agency intends to issue at a future date.

Toxicology:

870.6300 Developmental Neurotoxicity Study
870.1300 Acute Inhalation Toxicity Study

Residue Chemistry:

860.1200 Directions for Use
860.1340 Enforcement Analytical Method-Animals
860.1380 Storage Stability
860.1500 Magnitude of the Residue in Crop Plants (leaf lettuce, collards, and cabbage)

Occupational Exposure

875.1200 Dermal Exposure Indoors (ULV Cold Fogger)
875.1400 Inhalation Exposure Indoors (ULV Cold Fogger)

Environmental Toxicology

850.1735 Whole sediment acute toxicity for estuarine/marine invertebrates
850.1740 Whole sediment acute toxicity for estuarine/marine invertebrates
EPA/600/R-99/064 (ORD Study Method) Chronic Freshwater Sediment Testing
EPA/600/R01/020 (ORD Study Method) Chronic Estuarine/Marine Sediment Testing

Top of page


Regulatory Conclusion

The Agency has determined that permethrin containing products are eligible for reregistration provided that the risk mitigation measures are adopted and labels are amended to reflect these measures.

Top of page


For More Information

Electronic copies of the Permethrin RED and all supporting documents are available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0385 located on-line in the Federal Docket management System (FDMC) at http://www.regulations.gov.

For more information about EPA’s pesticide reregistration program, the Permethrin RED, or reregistration of individual products containing permethrin, please contact the Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. 20460, telephone 703-308-8000.

For information about the health affects of pesticides, or for assistance in recognizing and managing pesticide poisoning symptoms, please contact the National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC). Call toll-free 1-800-858-7378. The NPIC internet address is http://npic.orst.edu.

Top of page

Appendix A: Amended Agricultural Use Patterns

 

Current Labels

Mitigation Per the RED

Crop

Max. Rate per application
(lb ai/A)

Minimum
retreatment interval (days)

Seasonal Maximum  Application Rate
 (lb ai/A)

New
Maximum rate per application (lb ai/A)

New
Minimum
retreatment interval
(days)

New
Seasonal Maximum  Application Rate
 (lb ai/A)

Alfalfa

0.2

14

0.2 per cutting

0.2

30

0.2 per cutting

Almonds

0.4

3

2

0.25

10

0.75

Hazelnuts

0.4

As needed

1.6

0.25

10

0.75

Pistachios

0.4

As needed

1.6

0.3

10

0.9

Walnuts

0.4

As needed

1.6

0.25

10

0.75

Apples

0.4

As needed

0.6

0.25

10

0.5

Pears

0.4

As needed

0.8

0.25
(0.4 dormant only)

10

0.65

Cherries

0.2

As  needed

1.2

0.2

10

0.6

Peaches/Nectarines

0.3

7

1.5

0.25

10

0.75

Artichokes

0.3

As needed

1.5

0.3

10

0.9

Asparagus

0.1

As needed

0.4

0.1

7

0.4

Avocados

0.2

7

1.2

0.2

7

0.8

Broccoli

0.2

As needed

0.8

0.2

5

0.8

Brussels Sprouts

0.2

As needed

0.8

0.1

5

0.4

Cabbage

0.2

5

1

0.2

5

0.4 (0.8 in HI)

Cauliflower

0.2

As needed

0.8

0.1

5

0.4 (0.6 in HI)

Cantaloupes

0.2

7

1.6

0.2

7

0.8 (1.2 in HI)

Cucumbers

0.2

As needed

1.6

0.2

7

1.2

Pumpkins

0.2

As needed

1.6

0.2

7

1.2

Squash (summer, winter)

0.2

As needed

1.6

0.2

7

1.2

Watermelon

0.2

As needed

1.6

0.2

7

1.2

Eggplant

0.21

3

2

0.15

7

0.6 (1.0 in HI)

Peppers, bell

0.2

As  needed

1.6

0.2

5

0.8

Tomatoes

0.2

5

1.2

0.2

7

0.6 (0.8 in HI)

Celery

0.2

As needed

2

0.2

7

1.0 (1.2 in HI)

Lettuce

0.2

3

2

0.2

7

0.8 (1.2 in HI)

Spinach

0.2

As needed

2

0.2

3

0.6

Collards

0.2

As needed

0.8 (0.4 in SC, GA, FL, WA)

0.15

3

0.45

Greens, Turnip

0.2

As needed

0.8 (0.4 in SC, GA, FL, WA)

0.15

3

0.45

Corn, Field

0.2

6

0.6

0.15

7

0.45

Sweet Corn

0.25

3

1.2

0.2

3

0.8

Garlic

0.3

As needed

2

0.2

10

0.8

Onions

0.3

As needed

2

0.3

7

1.0

Horseradish

0.21

As needed

0.6

0.15

10

0.45

Papaya

0.4

7

1.2

0.15

10

0.75

Potatoes

0.2

As needed

1.6

0.2

10

0.8

Soybeans

0.2

As needed

0.4

0.2

10

0.4

Top of page

Publications | Glossary | A-Z Index | Jobs


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.