Skip common site navigation and headers
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Pesticides: Science and Policy
Begin Hierarchical Links EPA Home > Pesticides > Science and Policy > Advisory Committee > Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee > Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Registration Review Workgroup > PPDC Registration Review Workgroup Meeting - February 2, 2004 - Five Issues for Discussion End Hierarchical Links

 

PPDC Registration Review Workgroup Meeting - February 2, 2004 - Five Issues for Discussion

1. What action(s) initiates a pesticide’s registration review? Before expending resources in a pesticide’s registration review, the Agency would want to know whether registrants intend to support the pesticide and each of its uses. Other stakeholders might want to know this as well. The Agency is seeking advice on options for getting this type of information up-front in a way that is efficient for both the Agency and the public.
Please identify options for initiating a registration review and present the pros and cons of each.
2. Early submission of test data and other information to support a pesticide’s registration review. The Agency wants to receive pertinent information early in the registration review process in order to avoid redoing its risk assessments. Such rework delays completion of the pesticide’s review and ties up scarce resources.
Please identify issues that registrants and other stakeholders might have regarding “voluntary” submission of test data or other pertinent information.
Please discuss possible approaches to overcome any identified barriers or concerns.
3. Cost of the Registration Review Program. The Agency’s initial assessment of the economic impact of the registration review program must accompany the proposed procedural regulations for registration review. These analyses are required by the Paperwork Reduction Act, Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act , as well as other legislation and Executive Orders.
There are a range of options for this program, so the Agency would estimate the costs associated with each in order to make an informed decision.

Please discuss the nature and range of costs that registrants and other stakeholders might incur when this program is implemented.

4. Benefits of the program. What are the benefits of implementing a registration review program and who receives these benefits? There are a range of options for this program, so the Agency would estimate the benefits associated with each in order to make an informed decision.

5. What is a registration review decision? In a pesticide’s registration review, the Agency would determine whether a pesticide meets the requirements for registration under FIFRA section 3(c)(5). Additionally, FIFRA section 3(g)(2)(A) stipulates that EPA shall use its authority under FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B) to require submission of data when such data are necessary for registration review. The workgroup has discussed a number of possible scenarios that might represent the completion of registration review. Identify possible options along with their pros and cons.

 

Publications | Glossary | A-Z Index | Jobs

 
Begin Site Footer

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us