Registration Review
![]() |
Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Although the information provided here was accurate and current when first created, it is now outdated. |
Committee to Advise on
Reassessment and Transition
Paper # 18
EPA issued notice of proposed rulemaking on registration review
- On April 26, 2000, EPA issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on the registration review process required by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA).
- FQPA established this requirement for periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that over time they continue to meet statutory standards for safety.
- The comment period closes June 26, 2000.
The rule will cover procedures for accomplishing the review
- Aspects to be covered include:
- Setting priorities for review
- Establishing a mechanism for setting schedules for review
- Articulating the general approach for conducting and concluding the review
- Other areas to be determined as needed
- The reviews will occur on a 15-year cycle.
- Existing regulations and guidance on information required for pesticide registration will continue in effect.
- This process will not affect the ability of EPA to require data from registrants when needed to support a registration or to conduct other reviews, such as the Special Review process.
Goals of registration review
- Ensure continued protection of human health and the environment
- Keeping registrations up to date
- Incorporating lessons learned from reregistration
Initial Conceptual Model
- Step 1: Plan and schedule candidates for review
- Step 2: Publish schedule, define initial scope and level of review, and issue needed data call-ins and requests for applications for scheduled candidates
- Step 3: Registrants submit applications for review
- Step 4: EPA conducts the review and issues it for public comment
- Step 5: Consider comments, issue final review, and review registrant’s proposed labels
Issues for public comment
- EPA’s interpretation of the FIFRA Section 3(g) mandate for registration review
- Interpretation of "review of a pesticide’s registration every 15 years"
- Commencement of a 15-year registration review cycle
- Goals and objectives for the registration review program
- Relationship of registration review to other mandates
- Non-conventional pesticides
- Criteria for setting priorities and scheduling compounds for review
- Process for announcing schedules for registration review
- Scope and depth of registration review
- Submission of applications for registration review by registrants
- Potential penalties for submission of incomplete applications
- Incentives and opportunities for registrant participation in registration review
- Maximize work-sharing opportunities
- Public participation
- Role of the Internet in involving outside stakeholders
- Participation of small entities in the rulemaking process
For more information:
- EPA’s pesticide homepage www.epa.gov/pesticides has information about pesticide regulation as well as publications about pesticide issues for consumers.