Jump to main content.


MISSISSIPPI COTTON

MetaData

The field used to represent cotton production in Mississippi is located in Yazoo County. According to the 1997 Census of Agriculture, Mississippi is ranked 4th in production and acreage of cotton in the U.S. The crop is generally planted in Spring (late April) and harvested beginning in September. Row spacing is generally 38-inches with 3-4 plants per foot row. Row canopies tend to be very close to 100 percent, while the canopy between rows is much less. The crop may be grown under irrigation by furrow or canal systems. Most crops are planted by stale seedbed, no-till, or conventional methods. The soil selected to simulate the field is a Loring silt loam. Loring silt loam is a fine-silty, mixed, active, thermic, Qxyaquic Fragiudalfs. Nearly all soils are cleared and used to grow cotton, small grains, soybeans, hay and pasture. Loring silt loam is a moderately well drained with a fragipan, medium to rapid runoff, moderate permeability above the fragipan and moderately slowly permeable in the fragipan soils formed in loess. They are located on level to strongly sloping uplands and stream terraces. Slopes are generally between 0 to 20 percent. The soils are extensive in the lower Mississippi drainage basin. Loring silt loam is a Hydrologic Group C soil.

Table 1.
PRZM 3.12 Climate and Time Parameters for Yazoo County, Mississippi - Cotton
ParameterValueSource
Starting Date January 1, 1948Meteorological File - Little Rock, AR (W13963)
Ending Date December 31, 1983Meteorological File - Little Rock, AR (W13963)
Pan Evaporation Factor (PFAC) 0.76PRZM Manual Figure 5.1 (EPA, 1998)
Snowmelt Factor (SFAC) 0.15 cm C- 1PRZM Manual Table 5.1 (EPA, 1998)
Pan Factor Flag (IPEIND) 2PAN Evaporation data read from file
Minimum Depth of Evaporation (ANETD) 17.0 cmPRZM Manual Figure 5.2 (EPA, 1998)

Table 2.
PRZM 3.12 Erosion and Landscape Parameters for Yazoo County, Mississippi - Cotton
ParameterValueSource
Method to Calculate Erosion (ERFLAG) 4 (MUSS)PRZM Manual (EPA, 1998)
USLE K Factor (USLEK) 0.49 tons EI-1* EXPRES; PRZM Manual Table 5.3 (EPA, 1998)
USLE LS Factor (USLELS) 0.4EXPRES; PRZM Manual Table 5.5 (EPA, 1998)
USLE P Factor (USLEP) 0.75EXPRES; PRZM Manual Table 5.6 (EPA,1998)
Field Area (AFIELD) 172 haArea of Shipman Reservoir watershed (EPA, 1999)
NRCS Hyetograph (IREG) 3PRZM Manual Figure 5.12 (EPA, 1998)
Slope (SLP) 6%Selected according to QA/QC Guidance (EPA, 2001)
Hydraulic Length (HL) 600 mShipman Reservoir (EPA, 1999)

* EI = 100 ft-tons * in/ acre*hr


Table 3.
PRZM 3.12 Crop Parameters for Yazoo County, Mississippi - Cotton
ParameterValueSource
Initial Crop (INICRP) 1Set to one for all crops (EPA, 2001)
Initial Surface Condition (ISCOND) 1PRZM Input Collator (Burns, 1992)
Number of Different Crops (NDC) 1Set to crops in simulation - generally one
Number of Cropping Periods (NCPDS) 36Set to weather data. Meteorological File - Little Rock, AR (W13963)
Maximum rainfall interception storage of crop (CINTCP) 0.2EXPRES; PRZM manual Table 5.4 (EPA, 1998)
Maximum Active Root Depth (AMXDR) 125 cmEXPRES; Value developed from field specific data.
Maximum Canopy Coverage (COVMAX) 98EXPRES; Value developed from field specific data.
Soil Surface Condition After Harvest (ICNAH) 3PRZM Input Collator (Burns, 1992)
Date of Crop Emergence
(EMD, EMM, IYREM)
01/05 EXPRES and verified with Usual Planting and Harvest Dates for US Field Crops (USDA, 1984)
Date of Crop Maturity
(MAD, MAM, IYRMAT)
07/09
Date of Crop Harvest
(HAD, HAM, IYRHAR)
22/09
Maximum Dry Weight (WFMAX) 0.0Set to "0" Not used in simulation
SCS Curve Number (CN) 99, 93, 32 EXPRES; PRZM Manual Table 5.10-5.14 and Fig. 5.4; Field specific data.
Manning's N Value (MNGN) 0.014 RUSLE Project, PA6CTCTC: Cotton, conventional tillage, Holly Springs, MS (USDA, 2000)
USLE C Factor (USLEC) 0.223 - 0.718 RUSLE Project; PA6CTCTC: Cotton, conventional tillage, Holly Springs, MS (USDA, 2000)

Table 4.
PRZM 3.12 Loring Soil Parameters for Yazoo County, Mississippi - Cotton
ParameterValue Verification Source
Total Soil Depth (CORED) 155 cm PIC (Burns, 1992) Confirmed with: NRCS, National Soils Characterization Database (NRCS, 2001)
Number of Horizons (NHORIZ) 6
First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Soil Horizons (HORIZN = 1,2,3,4,5,6)
Horizon Thickness (THKNS)
  • 13 cm (HORIZN = 1)
  • 23 cm (HORIZN = 2)
  • 33 cm (HORIZN = 3)
  • 30 cm (HORIZN = 4)
  • 23 cm (HORIZN = 5)
  • 33 cm (HORIZN = 6)
PIC (Burns, 1992) Confirmed with: NRCS, National Soils Characterization Database (NRCS, 2001) http://soils.usda.gov/survey/nscd/ Exit EPA Disclaimer
Bulk Density (BD)
  • 1.4 g cm-3 (HORIZN = 1,2,3)
  • 1.45 g cm-3 (HORIZN = 4)
  • 1.49 g cm-3 (HORIZN = 5)
  • 1.51 g cm-3 (HORIZN = 6)
Initial Water Content (THETO)
  • 0.385 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =1)
  • 0.370 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =2,3)
  • 0.340 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =4)
  • 0.335 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =5)
  • 0.343 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =6)
Compartment Thickness (DPN)
  • 0.1 cm (HORIZN = 1)
  • 1.0 cm (HORIZN = 2)
  • 11 cm (HORIZN = 3)
  • 10 cm (HORIZN = 4)
  • 23 cm (HORIZN = 5)
  • 33 cm (HORIZN = 6)
Field Capacity (THEFC)
  • 0.385 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =1)
  • 0.370 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =2,3)
  • 0.340 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =4)
  • 0.335 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =5)
  • 0.343 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN =6)
Wilting Point (THEWP)
  • 0.151 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN = 1)
  • 0.146 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN = 2,3)
  • 0.125 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN = 4)
  • 0.137 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN = 5)
  • 0.147 cm3-H2O cm3-soil (HORIZN = 6)
Organic Carbon Content (OC)
  • 1.28% (HORIZN = 1)
  • 0.49% (HORIZN = 2)
  • 0.16% (HORIZN = 3)
  • 0.12% (HORIZN = 4)
  • 0.07% (HORIZN = 5)
  • 0.06% (HORIZN = 6)

Burns. 1992. Burns, L.A., (Coordinator), B.W. Allen, Jr., M.C. Barber, S.L. Bird, J.M. Cheplick, M.J. Fendley, D.R. Hartel, C.A. Kittner, F.L. Mayer, Jr., L.A. Suarez, and S.E. Wooten. Pesticide and Industrial Chemical Risk Analysis and Hazard Assessment, Version 3.0. (PIRANHA) Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA. 1992.

EPA. 1998. Carsel, R.F., J.C. Imhoff, P.R. Hummel, J.M. Cheplick, and A.S. Donigian, Jr. PRZM-3, A Model for Predicting Pesticide and Nitrogen Fate in the Crop Root and Unsaturated Soil Zones: Users Manual for Release 3.0. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

EPA. 1999. Jones, R.D., J. Breithaupt, J. Carleton, L. Libelo, J. Lin, R. Matzner, and R. Parker. Guidance for Use of the Index Reservoir in Drinking Water Exposure Assessments. Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. D.C.

EPA. 2001. Abel, S.A. Procedure for Conducting Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Existing and New PRZM Field and Orchard Crop Standard Scenarios. Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

USDA. 1984. Usual Planting and Harvesting Dates for U.S. Field Crops, Statistical Reporting Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook #628, pp.78.

USDA. 2000. Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) EPA Pesticide Project. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Agricultural Research Service (ARS).

Top of page


Publications | Glossary | A-Z Index | Jobs


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.