ECOFRAM Terrestrial Peer Input Workshop
Agenda
EPA's Initiative to Revise the Ecological Assessment Process for Pesticides
Terrestrial Peer Input Workshop
Holiday Inn Select
480 King Street
Old Town Alexandria, VA 22314
(map
)
(703) 549-6080
June 23 - 24, 1999
Day 1, June 23
12:30 - 1:00 Registration
1:00 - 1:30 Opening Remarks to the Terrestrial Input Panel Members
Denise Keehner, Acting Director
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pesticide Programs
Environmental Fate and Effects Division
1:30 -5:00 Presentations by Terrestrial Peer Input Panel Members
Dr. Timothy Barry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Economy and Environment
Climate and Policy Assessment DivisionMs. Sandra Bird
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
National Exposure Research Laboratory
Ecosystems Research DivisionDr. George P. Cobb
The Institute for Environmental and Human Health
Texas Tech University and the Texas Tech Health Science CenterDr. Peter Edwards MBE
Zeneca AgrochemicalsDr. Chris Grue
WA Coop. Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
School of FisheriesDr. Michael L Lavine
Duke University
Institute of Statistics and Decision ScienceDr. Robert Luttik
Center for Substances and Risk AssessmentDr. Dwayne Moore
The Cadmus GrupDr. Edward Odenkirchen
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pesticide ProgramsDr. Glenn Suter
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Center for Environmental AssessmentMr. Douglas J. Urban
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pesticide Programs
Day 2, June 24
8:00 - 12:00 Discussion
Given the defined endpoints (Terrestrial Draft Report, Page 2 - 8), how well do the tools presented allow for a probabilistic assessment of the endpoints? What approaches/data could be used to do a probabilistic assessment for those endpoints not fully addressed? (45 minutes)
Are the data recommended by the Terrestrial Draft Report sufficient to develop probabilistic assessments? (1 hour, 30 minutes)
Is the proposed level of refinement process practical and logical? (1 hour)
ECOFRAM concluded that some endpoints could not be assessed probabilistically given the current data and state-of-the-art. That is reproductive, population and ecosystem effects. Do you agree? (1 hour, 15 minutes)
12:00 - 1:00 Lunch
1:00 - 2:30 Closing Discussion
4. Discussion continued
5. Recommendations for future research and validation efforts are presented in Table 7.6.1. Do you agree with the scope and prioritization? (1 hour)
2:30 - 3:15 Public Comments
3:15 - 4:00 Closing Remarks
Please be advised that agenda times are approximate.