Bibliometrics

2008 Bibliometric Analysis for Papers on Topics Related to Global Change (GC) (papers published 1998 to 2007)
January 8, 2008

This is a bibliometric analysis of the papers prepared by intramural and extramural researchers of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) Global Change Research Program. For this analysis, 432 journal publications and 12 non-journal publications were reviewed, and they were published from 1998 to 2007 (the programs first papers were published in 1998). The journal publications were cited 5,925 times in the journals covered by Thomson Scientifics Web of Science¹ and Elseviers Scopus² . The non-journal publications were cited 720 times in journals and books. Of the 444 publications global change publications, 397 (89.4%) have been cited at least once in a journal or book.

Searches of Web of Science and Scopus were conducted to obtain times cited data for the Global Change Research Program journal publications and searches of Web of Science and Google Scholar were conducted to obtain times cited data for the non-journal publications. The analysis was completed using Thomsons Essential Science Indicators (ESI) and Journal Citation Reports (JCR) as benchmarks. ESI provides access to a unique and comprehensive compilation of essential science performance statistics and science trends data derived from Thomsons databases. For this analysis, the ESI highly cited papers thresholds as well as the hot papers thresholds were used to assess the influence and impact of the global change papers. JCR is a recognized authority for evaluating journals. It presents quantifiable statistical data that provide a systematic, objective way to evaluate the worlds leading journals and their impact and influence in the global research community. The two key measures used in this analysis to assess the journals in which the EPA global change papers are published are the Impact Factor and Immediacy Index. The Impact Factor is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The Impact Factor helps evaluate a journals relative importance, especially when compared to other journals in the same field. The Immediacy Index is a measure of how quickly the average article in a journal is cited. This index indicates how often articles published in a journal are cited within the same year and it is useful in comparing how quickly journals are cited.

This report is divided into four sections. The first section presents an analysis of the 432 global change journal publications analyzed by ESI field (e.g., Geosciences, Environment/Ecology, and Engineering). The second section presents an analysis of the 12 non-journal publications analyzed by ESI field. The third section provides an analysis of the 432 global change journal publications by focus area (e.g., Air Quality, Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem). The fourth section of this report includes some additional parameters on global warming publications that are reported by ESI.A summary of the results of the entire bibliometric analysis precedes the four sections.

Summary of Results

1. Analysis of Global Change Journal Publications
   1. One-fourth of the global change publications are highly cited papers. 108 (25.0%) of the global change papers qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of highly cited publications. This is 2.5 times higher than the 10% of papers expected to be highly cited. 12 (2.8%) of the global change papers qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 1%, which is 2.8 times higher than the number expected. 2 (0.5%) of these papers qualify as very highly cited when using the criteria for the top 0.1%, which is 5 times higher than the number anticipated. 1 (0.2%) of the papers actually meets the 0.01% threshold for the most highly cited papers, which is surprising given that the expected number for this program is 0.04 papers.
   2. The global change papers are more highly cited than the average paper. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, in 10 of the 14 fields in which the 432 EPA global change papers were published, the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1, indicating that the global change papers are more highly cited than the average papers in those fields. For all 14 fields combined, the ratio of total number of cites to the total number of expected cites (5,925 to 3,332.72) is 1.8, indicating that the global change papers are more highly cited than the average paper.
   3. One-fourth of the global change papers are published in high impact journals. 104 of the 432 papers were published in the top 10% of journals ranked by JCR Impact Factor, representing 24.1% of EPAs global change papers. This number is 2.4 times higher than the expected 43 papers. 123 of the 432 papers appear in the top 10% of journals ranked by JCR Immediacy Index, representing 28.5% of EPAs global change papers. This number is 2.8 times higher than the expected 43 papers.
   4. Eleven of the global change papers qualify as hot papers. Using the hot paper thresholds established by ESI as a benchmark, 11 hot papers, representing 2.6% of the global change papers, were identified in the analysis. Hot papers are papers that were highly cited shortly after they were published. The number of global change hot papers identified is 26 times higher than the expected 0.4 hot papers.
   5. The authors of the global change papers cite themselves less than the average author. 424 of the 5,925 cites are author self-cites. This 7.2% author self-citation rate is below the accepted range of 10-30% author self-citation rate.
   6. Thirty-four of the 1,006 authors of the global change papers are included in ISIHighlyCited.com,which is a database of the worlds most influential researchers who have made key contributions to science and technology during the period from 1981 to 1999.
   7. There were no patents issued to investigators from 1998 to 2007 for research that was conducted under EPAs Global Change Research Program.
2. Analysis of the Non-Journal Global Change Publications
   8. Nearly one-half of the non-journal publications were cited at least once in a journal or book. 5 (41.7%) of the 12 publications were cited at least once in a journal or book covered by Thomsons Web of Science and Google Scholar.
   9. The 12 non-journal publications were cited 720 times. The 5 books were cited 497 times, the 2 book chapters were cited 172 times, the 4 reports were cited 31 times, and the technical paper was cited 20 times.
   10. Nearly one-half of the non-journal global change publications are highly cited using the top 10% threshold in ESI. 5 (41.7%) of the global change non-journal publications qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of highly cited papers. This is 4.2 times the number of publications expected to be highly cited.
   11. One-fourth of the non-journal publications are highly cited using the top 1% threshold in ESI. 3 (25.0%) of the global change publications qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 1%, which is 25 times the number expected. 2 (16.7%) of these publications qualify as very highly cited when using the criteria for the top 0.1% and 1 (8.3%) of the papers qualify as extremely highly cited when using the criteria for the top 0.01%. These results are extraordinary given that the expected numbers are 0.012 publications and 0.0012 publications, respectively, for these two highest thresholds.
   12. The non-journal global change publications are cited more than the average paper. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, the ratio of actual to expected cites for every field to which the publications were assigned was greater than 1, indicating that the global change publications are cited more than the average papers in those fields. For all 4 fields combined, the ratio of total number of cites to the total number of expected cites (720 to 90.09) is 8.0, indicating that the global change publications are cited more than the average paper.
3. Analysis of Global Change Journal Publications by Focus Area
   13. More than one-third of the Human Health and one-fourth of the Air Quality and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus area publications are highly cited papers (this is 2.4 to 3.8 times the number expected). The percentage of global change papers that qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of highly cited publications ranges from 4.8% for the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment papers to 38.1% for the Human Health papers. The Human Health and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus areas have the highest percentages of highly cited publications when using the ESI criteria for the top 10%, and the number of highly cited papers in these areas is 3.8 to 2.6 times higher than expected. These two focus areas also hold the lead positions when using the ESI criteria for the top 1% of papers, and the number of very highly cited papers in these areas is 4.8 to 3.2 times higher than expected. Two (0.7%) papers in the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus area meet the ESI criteria for the top 0.1% of papers, which is 7 times higher than the expected number for this focus area. One (0.4%) of the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem papers meets the ESI criteria for the most highly cited papers (top 0.01%), which is 40 times the number expected for this focus area.
   14. The global papers are more highly cited than the average paper in three of the four focus areas. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1 for all but the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment focus area. This indicates that for three of the four focus areas, the global change papers are more highly cited than the average paper.
   15. Nearly three-fourths of the Human Health papers, one-fourth of the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem papers, and one-sixth of the Air Quality papers are published in high impact journals as determined by the JCR Impact Factor and Immediacy Index of the journals in which the papers are published. The number of global change papers published in high impact journals (the top 10% of journals) exceeds the expected 10% as determined by the JCR Impact Factor and Immediacy Index of the journals. The percentage of papers in high impact journals (by Impact Factor) for Human Health, Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem, and Air Quality ranges from 73.8% to 22.3% to 15.2%, which is 7.4, 2.2, and 1.5 times higher than expected, respectively. None of the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment papers are published in high impact journals determined by Impact Factor. The percentage of papers in high impact journals (by Immediacy Index) for three of the four focus areas is higher than expected, ranging from 73.8% for the Human Health papers to 30.3% for the Air Quality papers to 25.2% for the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem papers. These percentages are 7.4, 3.0, and 2.5 times higher than expected, respectively. Only 1 (2.4%) of the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment papers was published in a high impact journal determined by Immediacy Index.
   16. In all four of the focus areas, the percentage of publications cited one or more times is very high (i.e., 84.8% to 95.2%).
   17. The authors of the global change papers cite themselves less than the average self-citation rate. The author self-citation rates range from 4.0% to 14.3%. The rates for the Human Health, Regional- and Place-Based Assessment, and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus areas are well below the accepted range of 10-30% author self-citation rate, and the rate for the Air Quality papers is 14.3%, which is within the accepted range.
   18. There were hot papers published in three of the four focus areas. The highest percentage of hot papers (i.e., 9.5%) is in the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment focus area, followed by the Air Quality focus area at 3.0% and the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus area at 1.8%. These percentages are 95, 30, and 18 times higher than expected for these focus areas, respectively. There were no hot papers in the Human Health focus area.
4. Comparison of EPAs Global Change Publications to ESIs Top Global Warming Publication Parameters
   19. EPAs Global Change Research Program includes 1 (5.0%) of ESIs top 20 global warming papers (published from January 1996 to April 2006).
   20. The United States ranks first among the top 20 countries publishing on global warming.
   21. Nearly one-fourth of the EPA global change papers were published in ESIs top 20 journals in global warming.
   22. Thirteen (65%) of the top 20 institutions publishing on global warming participate in EPAs Global Change Research Program.
   23. The number of cites and cites per paper for global warming papers have begun to decline in recent years and this trend holds true for the EPA global change papers.

I. Analysis of Global Change Journal Publications by ESI Field

Highly Cited Global Change Journal Publications

All of the journals covered by ESI are assigned a field, and to compensate for varying citation rates across scientific fields, different thresholds are applied to each field. Thresholds are set to select highly cited papers to be listed in ESI. Different thresholds are set for both field and year of publication. Setting different thresholds for each year allows comparable representation for older and more recent papers for each field.

The 432 global change research papers reviewed for this analysis were published in journals that were assigned to 14 of the 22 ESI fields. The distribution of the papers among these 14 fields and the number of citations by field are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Global Change Papers by ESI Fields

There are 108 (25.0% of the papers analyzed) highly cited EPA global change papers in 10 of the 14 fieldsClinical Medicine, Computer Science, Economics & Business, Engineering, Environment/ Ecology, Geosciences, Microbiology, Multidisciplinary, Plant & Animal Science, and Social Scienceswhen using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of papers. Table 2 shows the number of global change papers in those 10 fields that meet the top 10% threshold in ESI. These publications are listed in the Appendix.

Twelve (2.8%) of the papers analyzed qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 1% of papers. These papers cover six fieldsEngineering, Environment/ Ecology, Geosciences, Microbiology, Multidisciplinary, and Plant & Animal Science. Table 3 shows the 12 (2.8% of the papers analyzed) papers by field that meet the top 1% threshold in ESI. The citations for these 12 papers are provided in Tables 4 through 9. The highly cited papers in Tables 4 through 9 are presented in order of year of publication with the oldest papers appearing first. Within the year of publication, the papers are ordered by increasing number of times cited.
Table 10 shows the number of papers by field that meet the top 0.1% threshold in ESI. These 2 (0.5%) very highly cited global change papers in the fields of Multidisciplinary and Plant & Animal Science are listed in Table 11. One (0.2%) of the global change papers meets the top 0.01% threshold in ESI, which is 20 times higher than expected. This is extraordinary because the expected number of papers that should meet this threshold for this analysis is 0.04. The paper that meets the top 0.01% threshold in ESI is presented in Table 12.

Table 2. Number of Highly Cited Global Change Papers by Field (top 10%)

Table 3. Number of Highly Cited Global Change Papers by Field (top 1%)

Table 4. Highly Cited Global Change Papers in the Field of Engineering (top 1%)

Table 5. Highly Cited Global Change Papers in the Field of
Environment/Ecology (top 1%)

Table 6. Highly Cited Global Change Papers in the Field of Geosciences (top 1%)

Table 7. Highly Cited Global Change Papers in the Field of Microbiology (top 1%)

 

Table 8. Highly Cited Global Change Papers in the Field of Multidisciplinary (top 1%)

Table 9. Highly Cited Global Change Papers in the Field of
Plant & Animal Science (top 1%)

Table 10. Number of Very Highly Cited Papers by Field (top 0.1%)

Table 11. Very Highly Cited Global Change Papers (top 0.1%)

Table 12. Extremely Highly Cited Global Change Papers (top 0.01%)

Ratio of Actual Cites to Expected Citation Rates

The expected citation rate is the average number of cites that a paper published in the same journal in the same year and of the same document type (article, review, editorial, etc.) has received from the year of publication to the present. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, in 10 of the 14 fields in which the global change papers were published, the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1, indicating that the global change papers are more highly cited than the average papers in those fields (see Table 13). For all 14 fields combined, the ratio of total number of cites to the total number of expected cites (5,925 to 3,332.72) is 1.8, indicating that the global change papers are more highly cited than the average paper.

Table 13. Ratio of Actual Cites to Expected Cites for Global Change Papers by Field

JCR Benchmarks

Impact Factor. The JCR Impact Factor is a well known metric in citation analysis. It is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The Impact Factor helps evaluate a journals relative importance, especially when compared to others in the same field. The Impact Factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year to articles published in the 2 previous years by the total number of articles published in the 2 previous years.

Table 14 indicates the number of global change papers published in the top 10% of journals, based on the JCR Impact Factor. One hundred four (104) of 432 papers were published in the top 10% of journals, representing 24.1% of the global change journal publications. This indicates that nearly one-quarter of the global change papers are published in the highest quality journals as determined by the JCR Impact Factor, which is 2.4 times higher than the expected percentage.

Table 14. Global Change Papers in Top 10% of Journals by JCR Impact Factor

Immediacy Index. The JCR Immediacy Index is a measure of how quickly the average article in a journal is cited. It indicates how often articles published in a journal are cited within the year they are published. The Immediacy Index is calculated by dividing the number of citations to articles published in a given year by the number of articles published in that year.

Table 15 indicates the number of global change papers published in the top 10% of journals, based on the JCR Immediacy Index. One hundred twenty-three (123) of the 432 papers appear in the top 10% of journals, representing 28.5% of the global change papers. This indicates that more than one-quarter of the global change papers are published in the highest quality journals as determined by the JCR Immediacy Index, which is 2.8 times higher than the expected percentage.

Table 15. Global Change Papers in Top 10% of Journals by JCR Immediacy Index

Hot Papers

ESI establishes citation thresholds for hot papers, which are selected from the highly cited papers in different fields, but the time frame for citing and cited papers is much shorterpapers must be cited within 2 years of publication and the citations must occur in a 2-month time period. Papers are assigned to 2-month periods and thresholds are set for each period and field to select 0.1% of papers.

Using the hot paper thresholds established by ESI as a benchmark, 11 hot papers, representing 2.6% of the global change papers, were identified in five fieldsEngineering, Environment/ Ecology, Geosciences, Multidisciplinary, and Plant & Animal Science. The number of global change hot papers is 26 times higher than expected. The hot papers are listed in Table 16.

Table 16. Hot Papers Identified Using ESI Thresholds

Author Self-Citation

Self-citations are journal article references to articles from that same author (i.e., the first author). Because higher author self-citation rates can inflate the number of citations, the author self-citation rate was calculated for the global change papers. Of the 5,925 total cites, 424 are author self-citesa 7.2% author self-citation rate. Garfield and Sher³ found that authors working in research-based disciplines tend to cite themselves on the average of 20% of the time. MacRoberts and MacRoberts⁴ claim that approximately 10% to 30% of all the citations listed fall into the category of author self-citation. Kovacic and Misak⁵ recently reported a 20% author self-citation rate for medical literature. Therefore, the 7.2% self-cite rate for the global change papers is below the range for author self-citation.

Highly Cited Researchers

A search of Thomsons ISIHighlyCited.com revealed that 34 (3.4%) of the 1,006 authors of the global change papers are highly cited researchers. ISIHighlyCited.com is a database of the worlds most influential researchers who have made key contributions to science and technology during the period from 1981 to 1999. The highly cited researchers identified during this analysis of the global change publications are presented in Table 17.

Table 17. Highly Cited Researchers Authoring Global Change Publications

Patents

There were no patents issued to investigators from 1998 to 2007 for research that was conducted under EPAs Global Change Research Program.

II. Analysis of Global Change Non-Journal Publications by ESI Field

This section contains a bibliometric analysis of the non-journal publications prepared by intramural and extramural researchers of EPAs Global Change Research Program. For this analysis, 12 non-journal publications4 reports, 5 books, 2 book chapters, and 1 technical paperwere reviewed. These publications were published from 2000 to 2007, and they were cited 720 times in the journals and books covered by Thomson Scientifics Web of Science and Google Scholar. All 12 (100%) of these publications have been cited at least once in a journal or book. The 4 reports were cited 31 times, the 5 books were cited 497 times, the 2 book chapters were cited 172 times, and the technical paper was cited 20 times.

Searches of Web of Science and Google Scholar were conducted to obtain times cited data for the Global Change Research Program non-journal publications. The analysis was completed using Thomsons Essential Science Indicators (ESI) as benchmarks. ESI provides access to a unique and comprehensive compilation of essential science performance statistics and science trends data derived from Thomsons databases. For this analysis, the ESI highly cited papers thresholds were used to assess the influence and impact of the global change non-journal publications.

Distribution of Non-Journal Publications Among ESI Fields

For this analysis, each publication was assigned to one of the 22 ESI fields so that the ESI thresholds for highly cited journal papers could be used to determine how many of the non-journal publications were highly cited. The 12 non-journal publications reviewed for this analysis were assigned to 4 of the 22 ESI fields. The distribution of the publications among these four fields and the number of citations by field are provided in Table 18.

Table 18. Non-Journal Global Change Publications by ESI Fields

Highly Cited Non-Journal Publications

There are 5 (41.7% of the publications analyzed) highly cited non-journal global change publications in three of the four ESI fieldsClinical Medicine, Environment/Ecology, and Geoscienceswhen using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of papers. Table 19 shows the number of global change publications in those three fields that meet the top 10% threshold in ESI. The citations of the publications that met the criteria for the top 10% of papers are presented in Table 20.

Three (25.0%) of the publications analyzed qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 1% of papers. These publications cover two fieldsEnvironment/Ecology and Geosciencesand these publications are listed in Table 21. Two (16.7%) of the non-journal publications met the top 0.1% threshold in ESI, and one (8.3%) actually met the criteria for the top 0.01% of papers, which is impressive given that the expected numbers of very highly cited non-journal publications for this program are 0.12 and 0.012, respectively, for these thresholds. The citations of the publications that met the criteria for the top 0.1% and 0.01% of papers are presented in Tables 22 and 23.

Table 19. Number of Highly Cited Non-Journal Global Change Publications
by Field (top 10%)

Table 20. Highly Cited Non-Journal Global Change Publications (top 10%)

Table 21. Highly Cited Non-Journal Global Change Publications (top 1%)

Table 22. Very Highly Cited Non-Journal Global Change Publications (top 0.1%)

Table 23. Extremely Highly Cited Non-Journal Global Change Publication (top 0.01%)

Ratio of Actual Cites to Expected Citation Rates

The expected citation rate is the average number of cites that a paper published in the same journal in the same year and of the same document type (article, review, editorial, etc.) has received from the year of publication to the present. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, the non-journal global change publications were cited more than the average paper in all 4 fields to which the non-journal global change publications were assigned, i.e., the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1 (see Table 24). For all 4 fields combined, the ratio of total number of cites to the total number of expected cites (720 to 90.09) is 8.0, indicating that the non-journal global change publications are cited more than the average journal paper.

Table 24. Ratio of Actual Cites to Expected Cites for Non-Journal Global Change Publications by Field

III. Analysis of Global Change Publications by Focus Area

This section of the report presents an analysis of the global change papers by focus area (i.e., Air Quality, Human Health, Regional- and Place-Based Assessment, and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem). The data are presented by focus area in Table 25, which includes eight key bibliometric parameters.

The results of the analysis are presented below and the numbers link the findings with the corresponding data in Table 25.

1. No. of Global Change Papers AnalyzedThere were 66 Air Quality, 42 Human Health, 42 Regional- and Place-Based Assessment, and 282 Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem publications analyzed. Sixty-five percent of the global change publications fall under the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus area.

2. Total No. of Highly Cited PublicationsThis analysis used four of the ESI thresholds for highly cited papersthose in the top 10%, top 1%, top 0.1%, and top 0.01%. It is extraordinary for a publication to meet the threshold for the top 0.01%; these publications are rare and should not be expected in every program. Using the ESI thresholds, about 25% of the global change publications are highly cited papers (this is 2.5 times the number expected). The percentage of global change papers that qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of highly cited publications ranges from 4.8% for the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment papers to 38.1% for the Human Health papers. The Human Health and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus areas have the highest percentages of highly cited publications when using the ESI criteria for the top 10%, and the number of highly cited papers in these areas is 3.8 and 2.6 times higher than expected. The Human Health and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus areas also hold the lead positions when using the ESI criteria for the top 1% of papers, and the number of very highly cited papers in these areas is 4.8 and 3.2 times higher than expected. Two (0.7%) papers in the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus area meet the ESI criteria for the top 0.1% of papers, which is 7 times higher than the expected number. One (0.4%) of the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem papers meets the ESI criteria for the most highly cited papers (top 0.01%), which is extraordinary because the expected number of papers in this top category for a typical program of this size would be 0.03 papers.

3. Ratio of Actual to Expected CitesThe global papers are more highly cited than the average paper. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1 for all but one of the focus areas (i.e., Regional- and Place-Based Assessment). This indicates that the global change papers are more highly cited than the average papers published in these fields.

4. No. of Papers in High Impact Journals by Impact FactorNearly three-fourths of the Human Health, one-fourth of the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem, and one-sixth of the Air Quality papers are published in high impact journals as determined by the Impact Factor of the journals in which the papers are published. The percentage of papers in high impact journals for the Air Quality, Human Health, and Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus areas ranges from 15.2% to 73.8% to 22.3%, which is 1.5, 7.4, and 2.2 times higher than expected for these three focus areas, respectively. None of the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment papers are published in high impact journals.

5. No. of Papers in High Impact Journals by Immediacy IndexNearly three-fourths of the Human Health, one-third of the Air Quality, and one-fourth of the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem papers are published in high impact journals as determined by the Immediacy Index of the journals in which the papers are published. The percentage of papers published in high impact journals ranges from 73.8% for Human Health, 30.3% for Air Quality, and 25.2% for Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem, which is 7.4, 3.0, and 2.5 times higher than expected for these three focus areas, respectively. Only 2.4% of the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment papers are published in high impact journals as determined by Immediacy Index, which is less than the expected 10%.

6. Total No. of Publications Cited One or More TimesIn all four focus areas, the percentage of publications cited one or more times is very high (i.e., 84.8% to 95.2%).

7. Total No. of Author Self CitesFor three of the four focus areas, the authors of the global change papers cite themselves less than the average self-citation rate. The author self-citation rates for these three focus areas range from 4.0% for Human Health, 4.5% for Regional- and Place-Based Assessment and 4.9% for Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem. The rates for these three focus areas are well below the accepted range of 10-30% author self-citation rate, and the rate for the Air Quality papers is 14.3%, which is within the average range.

8. No. of Hot PapersUsing the hot paper thresholds established by ESI as a benchmark, there were hot papers published in three of the four focus areas. The highest percentage of hot papers (i.e., 9.5%) is in the Regional- and Place-Based Assessment focus area, followed by the Air Quality focus area at 3.0% and the Water Quality/Aquatic Ecosystem focus area at 1.8%. These percentages are 95, 30, and 18 times higher than expected for these three focus areas, respectively. None of the Human Health papers qualified as hot papers.

Table 25. Key Bibliometric Parameters for Global Change Papers by Focus Area

 IV. Additional ESI Parameters for Global Warming Publications

Since the last bibliometric analysis for the Global Change Research Program, which was conducted in 2006, ESI has begun analyzing special topics and reporting information such as the top 20 papers, top 20 authors, top 20 institutions, and top 20 countries for these special topics. One of the of ESI special topics is global warming. The parameters reported by ESI for the special topic of global warming are compared with the results of the analysis of the EPA Global Change Research Program publications below.

Top 20 Papers in Global WarmingA review of ESIs top 20 papers on the topic of global warming (published from January 1, 1996 to April 30, 2006), indicates that 1 (5.0% of the top 20 papers) are papers from EPAs Global Change Research Program. This paper is listed in Table 26.

Top 20 Authors in Global WarmingNone of ESIs top 20 authors in global warming (ranked by total cites from 1996-2006) authored papers for EPAs Global Change Research Program.

Table 26. EPA Global Change Paper in ESIs Top 20 Global Warming Papers Overall
(Published from January 1, 1996 to April 30, 2006)

Top 20 Countries Publishing in Global WarmingThe United States ranks number one among the top 20 countries publishing on global warming. From 1996-2006, the United States published 1,362 papers that were cited 16,682 times. The second ranking country, England, published 447 papers that were cited 6,259 times.

Top 20 Journals in Global Warming100 (23.2%) of the EPA Global Change Research Program papers were published in ESIs top 20 journals in global warming (ranked by total cites from 1996-2006). The top 20 journals and the number of EPA global change published in these journals are provided in Table 27.

Table 27. ESIs Top 20 Journals in Global Warming (Ranked by Total Cites, 1996-2006)

Top 20 Institutions Publishing on Global WarmingThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) ranks number one on ESIs top 20 overall institutions publishing on global warming with 48 papers (published from 1996-2006) that were cited 1,559 times. NASA is one of the partners on EPA grants that publish under the Global Change Research Program. Thirteen (65.0%) of the top 20 institutions publishing global warming papers are participants in EPAs Global Change Research Program. The top 20 institutions are listed in Table 28.

Table 28. ESIs Top 20 Institutions Publishing on Global Warming
(Ranked by Total Cites, 1996-2006)

Global Warming Publication TrendsAccording to ESI, the number of global warming papers generally rose from 1996 to 2003; the number of papers declined slightly in 2004 and then increased in 2005 (because the data for 2006 are incomplete, no conclusion can be drawn concerning the trend in 2006). The number of cites of global warming papers published from 1996 to 2000 increased steadily, but has declined for papers published from 2001 to 2005. The trends are depicted in Figure 1. The number of EPA Global Change Research Program publications, however, increased from 1998 to 2000, declined in 2001, peaked in 2002, and leveled off from 2003 to 2006 at an average of 41 publications per year. Like the overall global warming paper trends identified by ESI, the number of cites and the cites per paper for the EPA Global Change Research Program publications have declined significantly in recent years.

Figure 1. Comparison of ESI Global Warming Publication Trends with EPA Global Change Research Program Publication Trends

ESI Field Distribution of Global Warming PapersThe majority of global warming papers from 1996 to 2006 were published in journals that fall within the ESI field of Geosciences, followed by the fields of Environment/Ecology, Engineering, Multidisciplinary, and Social Sciences. For the EPA global change papers included in this analysis, the majority of the papers were published in the ESI field of Environment/Ecology, followed by Geosciences, Multidisciplinary, Plant & Animal Science, and Engineering. The distribution of global warming papers among the 22 ESI fields and the distribution of the EPA global change papers for comparison are presented in Table 29.

Table 29. Comparison of Field Distribution of Global Warming Papers (Ranked by Number of Papers, 1991-2001) to Field Distribution of EPA Global Change Research Program Papers (Published from 1998-2007)

¹ Thomson Scientifics Web of Science provides access to current and retrospective multidisciplinary information from approximately 8,830 of the most prestigious, high impact research journals in the world. Web of Science also provides cited reference searching.

² Scopus is a large abstract and citation database of research literature and quality Web sources designed to support the literature research process. Scopus offers access to 15,000 titles from 4,000 different publishers, more than 12,850 academic journals (including coverage of 535 Open Access journals, 750 conference proceedings, and 600 trade publications), 27 million abstracts, 245 million references, 200 million scientific Web pages, and 13 million patent records.

³ Garfield E, Sher IH. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation 1963;18(July):195-210.

⁴ MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 1989;40(5):342-349.

⁵ Kavaci N, Misak A. Author self-citation in medical literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004;170(13):1929-1930.

Top of page