Extramural Research
Bibliometrics
Grantee Research Project Results
2005 Bibliometric Analysis (Revised) for Papers on Topics Related to Drinking Water
Revised May 9, 2007
This is a revised bibliometric analysis of the papers prepared by intramural and extramural researchers of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on topics related to drinking water (DW). This analysis was revised in May 2007 because the journals were initially categorized into the fields used by Thomson Scientifics Essential Science Indicators (ESI) using information provided in Thomsons Journal Citation Reports (JCR); for this revised analysis, the journals were categorized into ESI fields using the journal category list by ESI that is available on the Internet athttp://in-cites.com/journal-list/index.html. The Journal List for ESI was made available in 2006 and the current list contains all of the 12,734 journals covered for ESI up to December 31, 2006. This list is updated bimonthly by Thomson. This revised bibliometric analysis will allow comparison of the results of this 2005 analysis to those of the analysis performed in 2007.
For this analysis, 691 papers were reviewed. These 691 papers, published from 1994 to 2005, were cited 8,334 times in the journals covered by Thomsons Web of Science.1 Of these 691 papers, 567 (82%) have been cited at least once in a journal. Searches of Thomson Scientifics Web of Science were conducted to obtain times cited data for the drinking water journal publications. The analysis was completed using Thomsons ESI and JCR as benchmarks. ESI provides access to a unique and comprehensive compilation of essential science performance statistics and science trends data derived from Thomsons databases. For this analysis, the ESI highly cited papers thresholds as well as the hot papers thresholds were used to assess the influence and impact of the drinking water papers. JCR is a recognized authority for evaluating journals. It presents quantifiable statistical data that provide a systematic, objective way to evaluate the worlds leading journals and their impact and influence in the global research community. The two key measures used in this analysis to assess the journals in which the EPA drinking water papers are published are the Impact Factor and Immediacy Index. The Impact Factor is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The Impact Factor helps evaluate a journals relative importance, especially when compared to other journals in the same field. The Immediacy Index is a measure of how quickly the average article in a journal is cited. This index indicates how often articles published in a journal are cited within the same year and it is useful in comparing how quickly journals are cited.
The report includes a summary of the results of the bibliometric analysis, an analysis of the 691 drinking water research papers analyzed by ESI field (e.g., chemistry, microbiology, pharmacology & toxicology), and an analysis of the journals in which the drinking water papers were published.
Summary of Analysis
Nearly one-fifth of the drinking water publications are highly cited papers. A review of the citations indicates that 135 (19.54%) of the drinking water papers qualify as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of highly cited publications. Eight (1.16%) of the drinking water papers actually qualify as highly cited when using the criteria for the top 1%, and 1 (0.14%) of these papers qualify as very highly cited when using the criteria for the top 0.1%. None of the drinking water papers met the criteria for the top 0.01%.
The drinking water papers are more highly cited than the average paper. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, in 12 of the 16 fields in which the EPA drinking water papers were published, the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1, indicating that the drinking water papers are more highly cited than the average papers in those fields. For the 16 fields combined, the ratio of actual to expected cites is 1.63, indicating that the drinking water papers are more highly cited than the average paper.
Nearly one-third of the drinking water papers are published in very high impact journals.
Two-hundred two (202) of 691 papers were published in the top 10% of journals ranked by JCR Impact Factor, representing 29% of EPAs drinking water papers. Sixteen percent (110 out of the 691 papers) of the drinking water papers are published in the top 10% of journals ranked by JCR Immediacy Factor.
Six of the drinking water papers qualify as hot papers. Using the hot paper thresholds established by ESI as a benchmark, 6 hot papers, representing 0.87% of the drinking water papers, were identified in the analysis.
The author self-citation rate is below average. Four-hundred sixty-eight (468) of the 8,334 cites are author self-cites. This 5.6% author self-citation rate is below the accepted range of 10-30% author self-citation rate.
Highly Cited Drinking Water Publications
The 691 drinking water papers reviewed for this analysis covered 16 of the 22 ESI fields. The distribution of the papers among these 16 fields and the number of citations by field are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Drinking Water Papers by ESI Fields
ESI Field |
No. of Citations |
No. of EPA DW Papers |
Average Cites/Paper |
Pharmacology & Toxicology |
1,969 |
128 |
15.38 |
Environment/Ecology |
1,408 |
176 |
8.00 |
Clinical Medicine |
1,407 |
90 |
15.63 |
Chemistry |
950 |
63 |
15.08 |
Microbiology |
883 |
68 |
12.98 |
Molecular Biology & Genetics |
522 |
35 |
14.91 |
Immunology |
390 |
19 |
20.53 |
Engineering |
306 |
50 |
6.12 |
Biology & Biochemistry |
173 |
21 |
8.24 |
Neuroscience & Behavior |
132 |
9 |
14.67 |
Social Sciences, general |
82 |
7 |
11.71 |
Agricultural Sciences |
72 |
16 |
4.50 |
Plant & Animal Science |
20 |
3 |
6.67 |
Physics |
16 |
1 |
16.00 |
Computer Science |
3 |
1 |
3.00 |
Geosciences |
1 |
4 |
0.25 |
Totals |
8,334 |
691 |
12.06 |
There were 135 (19.54% of the papers analyzed) highly cited EPA drinking water papers in 11 fieldsAgricultural Sciences, Biology & Biochemistry, Chemistry, Clinical Medicine, Engineering, Environment/Ecology, Immunology, Microbiology, Pharmacology & Toxicology, Physics, and Social Scienceswhen using the ESI criteria for the top 10% of papers. Table 2 shows the 135 EPA drinking water papers that met the top 10% threshold in ESI. Eight (1.16% of the papers analyzed) of these papers qualified as highly cited when using the ESI criteria for the top 1% of papers. These 8 papers covered three fieldsClinical Medicine, Environment/Ecology, and Pharmacology & Toxicology. Table 3 shows the 8 EPA papers in those 3 fields that met the top 1% threshold in ESI. There was 1 (0.14% of the papers analyzed) very highly cited EPA drinking water paper in the field of Pharmacology & Toxicology. This paper met the ESI criteria for the top 0.1% of papers. None of the papers met the top 0.01% threshold in ESI.
Table 2. Number of Highly Cited Drinking Water Papers by Field (top 10%)
ESI Field |
Citations |
No. of Papers |
Average Cites/Paper |
% of EPA Papers in Field |
Pharmacology &Toxicology |
1,228 |
26 |
47.23 |
20.31% |
Environment/Ecology |
872 |
43 |
20.28 |
24.43% |
Chemistry |
717 |
24 |
29.88 |
38.10% |
Clinical Medicine |
705 |
9 |
78.33 |
10.00% |
Microbiology |
424 |
9 |
47.11 |
13.24% |
Engineering |
219 |
13 |
16.85 |
26.00% |
Immunology |
174 |
3 |
58.00 |
15.79% |
Biology & Biochemistry |
81 |
2 |
40.50 |
9.52% |
Social Sciences, general |
78 |
4 |
19.50 |
57.14% |
Agricultural Sciences |
19 |
1 |
19.00 |
6.25% |
Physics |
16 |
1 |
16.00 |
100.00% |
Totals |
4,533 |
135 |
33.58 |
19.54% |
Table 3. Number of Highly Cited Drinking Water Papers by Field (top 1%)
ESI Field |
Citations |
No. of Papers |
Average Cites/Paper |
% of EPA Papers in Field |
Pharmacology & Toxicology |
446 |
5 |
89.20 |
3.91% |
Clinical Medicine |
319 |
1 |
319.00 |
1.11% |
Environment/Ecology |
30 |
2 |
15.00 |
1.14% |
Totals |
795 |
8 |
99.38 |
1.16% |
The citations for the 8 highly cited papers (top 1%) are presented in Table 4, and the citations for the 1 very highly cited paper is provided in Table 5.
Table 4. Highly Cited Drinking Water Papers (top 1%)
ESI Field |
No. of Cites |
First Author |
Paper |
Pharmacology & Toxicology |
116 |
Kitchin KT |
Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2001;172(3):249-261. |
114 |
Styblo M |
Comparative toxicity of trivalent and pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals in rat and human cells. Archives of Toxicology 2000;74(6):289-299. |
|
98 |
Mass MJ |
Methylated trivalent arsenic species are genotoxic. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2001;14(4):355-361. |
|
71 |
Thomas DJ |
The cellular metabolism and systemic toxicity of arsenic. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2001;176(2):127-144. |
|
47 |
Hughes MF |
Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicology Letters 2002;133(1):1-16. |
|
Clinical Medicine |
319 |
Dupont HL |
The infectivity of Cryptosporidium-parvum in healthy-volunteers. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;332(13):855-859. |
Environment/ Ecology |
25 |
Styblo M |
The role of biomethylation in toxicity and carcinogenicity of arsenic: A research update. Environmental Health Perspectives 2002;110(Suppl 5):767-771. |
5 |
Plewa MJ |
Halonitromethane drinking water disinfection byproducts: chemical characterization and mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Environmental Science & Technology 2004;38(1):62-68. |
Table 5. Very Highly Cited Drinking Water Paper (Top 0.1%)
ESI Field |
No. of Cites |
First Author |
Paper |
Pharmacology & Toxicology |
116 |
Kitchin KT |
Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2001;172(3):249-261. |
Ratio of Actual Cites to Expected Citation Rates
The expected citation rate is the average number of cites that a paper published in the same journal in the same year and of the same document type (article, review, editorial, etc.) has received from the year of publication to the present. Using the ESI average citation rates for papers published by field as the benchmark, in 12 of the 16 fields in which the EPA drinking water papers were published, the ratio of actual to expected cites is greater than 1, indicating that the EPA papers are more highly cited than the average papers in those fields (see Table 6).
Table 6. Ratio of Average Cites to Expected Cites for
Drinking Water Papers by Field
ESI Field |
Total Cites |
Expected Cite Rate |
Ratio |
Agricultural Sciences |
72 |
56.69 |
1.27 |
Biology & Biochemistry |
173 |
181.03 |
0.96 |
Chemistry |
950 |
427.19 |
2.22 |
Clinical Medicine |
1,407 |
814.94 |
1.73 |
Computer Science |
3 |
0.53 |
5.66 |
Engineering |
306 |
130.57 |
2.34 |
Environment/Ecology |
1,408 |
881.24 |
1.60 |
Geosciences |
1 |
2.90 |
0.34 |
Immunology |
390 |
273.18 |
1.43 |
Microbiology |
883 |
585.39 |
1.51 |
Molecular Biology & Genetics |
522 |
611.08 |
0.85 |
Neuroscience & Behavior |
132 |
140.15 |
0.94 |
Pharmacology & Toxicology |
1,969 |
968.94 |
2.03 |
Physics |
16 |
4.13 |
3.87 |
Plant & Animal Science |
20 |
14.85 |
1.35 |
Social Sciences, general |
82 |
18.28 |
4.48 |
Totals |
8,334 |
5111.09 |
1.63 |
JCR Benchmarks
The Impact Factor is a well known metric in citation analysis. It is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. The Impact Factor helps evaluate a journals relative importance, especially when compared to others in the same field. The Impact Factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year to articles published in the 2 previous years by the total number of articles published in the 2 previous years.
Table 7 indicates the number of drinking water papers published in the top 10% of journals, based on the JCR Impact Factor. Two-hundred two (202) of 691 papers were published in the top 10% of journals, representing 29% of EPAs drinking water papers.
Table 7. Drinking Water Papers in Top 10% of Journals by JCR Impact Factor
EPA DW Papers in that Journal |
Journal |
Impact Factor |
JCR IF Rank |
37 |
Environmental Science & Technology |
3.592 |
487 |
30 |
Applied and Environmental Microbiology |
3.820 |
418 |
24 |
Environmental Health Perspectives |
3.408 |
538 |
18 |
Analytical Chemistry |
5.250 |
248 |
10 |
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry |
3.200 |
605 |
9 |
Chemical Research in Toxicology |
3.332 |
555 |
9 |
Journal of Infectious Diseases |
4.481 |
311 |
8 |
Mutation Research-Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis |
3.433 |
530 |
7 |
Infection and Immunity |
3.875 |
403 |
6 |
Carcinogenesis |
4.663 |
292 |
5 |
Epidemiology |
4.220 |
350 |
4 |
Journal of Virology |
5.225 |
251 |
4 |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
3.489 |
519 |
3 |
Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research |
5.783 |
210 |
3 |
International Journal of Epidemiology |
3.289 |
575 |
2 |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
5.340 |
240 |
2 |
American Journal of Epidemiology |
4.486 |
310 |
2 |
TrACTrends in Analytical Chemistry |
3.539 |
502 |
1 |
New England Journal of Medicine |
34.833 |
5 |
1 |
Nature Medicine |
30.550 |
9 |
1 |
Chemical Reviews |
21.036 |
23 |
1 |
Lancet |
18.316 |
28 |
1 |
Cancer Research |
8.649 |
105 |
1 |
Mass Spectrometry Reviews |
7.364 |
143 |
1 |
FASEB Journal |
7.172 |
149 |
1 |
Bioinformatics |
6.701 |
168 |
1 |
Nucleic Acids Research |
6.575 |
171 |
1 |
Journal of Biological Chemistry |
6.482 |
179 |
1 |
Free Radical Biology and Medicine |
5.063 |
260 |
1 |
Drug Discovery Today |
4.943 |
271 |
1 |
Mutation Research-DNA Repair |
3.987 |
386 |
1 |
Drug Metabolism and Disposition |
3.652 |
462 |
1 |
Methods |
3.622 |
469 |
1 |
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews |
3.479 |
522 |
1 |
American Journal of Public Health |
3.363 |
551 |
1 |
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry |
3.321 |
563 |
1 |
Journal of Nutrition |
3.321 |
563 |
Total = 202 |
|
|
|
Immediacy Index
The journal Immediacy Index is a measure of how quickly the average article in a journal is cited. It indicates how often articles published in a journal are cited within the year they are published. The Immediacy Index is calculated by dividing the number of citations to articles published in a given year by the number of articles published in that year.
Table 8 indicates the number of EPA drinking water papers published in the top 10% of journals, based on the JCR Immediacy Index. One-hundred ten (110) of the 691 papers analyzed appear in the top 10% of journals, representing 16% of EPAs drinking water papers.
Table 8. Drinking Water Papers in Top 10% of Journals by JCR Immediacy Index
EPA Papers in that Journal |
Journal |
Immediacy Index |
JCR II Rank |
24 |
Environmental Health Perspectives |
0.869 |
304 |
18 |
Analytical Chemistry |
0.657 |
493 |
9 |
Journal of Infectious Diseases |
0.889 |
287 |
8 |
Mutation Research-Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis |
0.721 |
420 |
7 |
Infection and Immunity |
0.624 |
544 |
6 |
Carcinogenesis |
0.775 |
379 |
5 |
Epidemiology |
0.938 |
264 |
4 |
Journal of Virology |
1.124 |
188 |
3 |
International Journal of Epidemiology |
1.376 |
131 |
2 |
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
1.024 |
216 |
2 |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
1.007 |
225 |
2 |
American Journal of Epidemiology |
0.908 |
281 |
2 |
Journal of Applied Toxicology |
0.759 |
391 |
1 |
Free Radical Biology and Medicine |
0.712 |
432 |
1 |
New England Journal of Medicine |
11.719 |
2 |
1 |
Nature Medicine |
6.749 |
5 |
1 |
Lancet |
5.826 |
10 |
1 |
Chemical Reviews |
2.955 |
40 |
1 |
Drug Discovery Today |
1.882 |
86 |
1 |
Nucleic Acids Research |
1.370 |
133 |
1 |
FASEB Journal |
1.247 |
154 |
1 |
Journal of Biological Chemistry |
1.231 |
160 |
1 |
ATLA-Alternatives to Laboratory Animals |
0.964 |
247 |
1 |
Cancer Research |
0.935 |
268 |
1 |
Drug Metabolism and Disposition |
0.791 |
368 |
1 |
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews |
0.788 |
371 |
1 |
Bioinformatics |
0.736 |
408 |
1 |
American Journal of Public Health |
0.682 |
465 |
1 |
Journal of Nutrition |
0.647 |
507 |
1 |
Methods |
0.596 |
577 |
1 |
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology |
0.590 |
586 |
Total = 110 |
|
|
Hot Papers
ESI establishes citation thresholds for hot papers, which are selected from the highly cited papers in different fields, but the time frame for citing and cited papers is much shorterpapers must be cited within 2 years of publication and the citations must occur in a 2-month time period. Papers are assigned to 2-month periods and thresholds are set for each period and field to select 0.1% of papers. There were no hot papers identified for the current 2-month period (i.e., January-February 2005), but there were a number of hot papers identified from previous periods.
Using the hot paper thresholds established by ESI as a benchmark, 6 hot papers, representing 0.87% of the drinking water papers, were identified in four fieldsClinical Medicine, Environment/ Ecology, Microbiology, and Pharmacology & Toxicology. The hot papers are listed in Table 9.
Table 9. Hot Papers Identified Using ESI Thresholds
Field |
ESI Hot Papers Threshold |
No. of Cites in 2-Month Period |
Paper |
Clinical Medicine |
12 |
12 cites in September-October 1996 |
Dupont HL, et al. The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;332(13):855-859. |
Environment/Ecology |
8 |
10 cites in July-August 2004 |
Styblo M, et al. The role of biomethylation in toxicity and carcinogenicity of arsenic: a research update. Environmental Health Perspectives 2002;110(Suppl 5):767-771. |
Microbiology |
14 |
16 cites in April-May 2003 |
Small J, et al. Direct detection of 16S rRNA in soil extracts by using oligonucleotide microarrays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2001;67(10):4708-4716. |
Pharmacology & Toxicology |
8 |
8 cites in July-August 2002 |
Styblo M, et al. Comparative toxicity of trivalent and pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals in rat and human cells. Archives of Toxicology 2000;74(6):289-299. |
|
8 |
10 cites in November-December 2002 |
Kitchin KT. Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2001;173(3):249-261. |
8 |
11 cites in August-September 2004 |
Nesnow S, et al. DNA damage induced by methylated trivalent arsenicals is mediated by reactive oxygen species. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2002;15(12):1627-1634. |
Author Self-Citation
Self-citations are journal article references to articles from that same author (i.e., the first author). Because higher author self-citation rates can inflate the number of citations, the author self-citation rate was calculated for the drinking water papers. Of the 8,334 total cites, 468 are author self-citesa 5.6% author self-citation rate. Garfield and Sher 2 found that authors working in research-based disciplines tend to cite themselves on the average of 20% of the time. MacRoberts and MacRoberts 3 claim that approximately 10% to 30% of all the citations listed fall into the category of author self-citation. Therefore, the 5.6% self-cite rate for the drinking water papers is below the range for author self-citation.
1 Thomsons Web of Science provides access to current and retrospective multidisciplinary information from approximately 8,700 of the most prestigious, high impact research journals in the world. Web of Science also provides cited reference searching.
2 Garfield E, Sher IH. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation 1963;18(July):195-201.
3 MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 1989;40(5):342-349.