Please see https://www.epa.gov/airtoxics/nata/natsalim2.html
for details on the limitations associated with the 1996 National-Scale
Air Toxics Assessment. The information provided on limitations,
variability and uncertainty in the 1996 air toxics assessment
also pertains to the draft emissions and ambient concentrations
for 1999, noting that the emissions data used here are for 1999
and not 1996.
In addition, please be aware of the following limitations in
draft version 3 of the National Emission Inventory for HAPs:
1) Not all of the State submitted data have been incorporated
into this version. See for more details:
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/1999nei_online.pdf
The above link also provides more information on how the inventory
was developed and how you can access more detailed information
on the inventory.
2) Data were augmented when the quality assurance routines found
issues with the draft inventory's point source locations and stack
parameters. These procedures are different from those used for
the 1996 NATA. For example, point sources with missing or invalid
locations (e.g., geographic coordinates conflict with the county
information) were defaulted to the county centroid rather than
to different tract centroids in the county. See the files posted
under the following link for more details on the augmentation
procedures:
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/invent/index.html
The relevant files under this link are: National
Emission Inventory QA and Augmentation Memo (PDF 35K), SCC-
Based Emission Release Point Physical Parameter Default File
(XLS 1.3M), and SIC-Based
Emission Release Point Physical Parameter Default File (XLS
403K).
With regards to the ambient concentrations, please note the
following:
1. Background concentrations were the same as those used in
1996 (see https://www.epa.gov/airtoxics/nata/backcon.html
). They will be updated when concentrations are modeled with the
final version 3 1999 National Emission Inventory for HAPs to account
for more recent data and spatial variation of background.
2. Secondary concentrations for acetaldehyde and formaldehyde
were estimated using a less refined method than the ASPEN model
approach for this draft. For these pollutants secondary contributions
were estimated using similar proportions of secondary to primary
concentrations as were computed by ASPEN in the 1996 NATA. When
the concentrations are modeled with the final version 3 inventory,
the current ASPEN methodology or an enhanced photochemical-modeling
based methodology will be used.